[Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.4 released

Niels de Vos ndevos at redhat.com
Wed Mar 13 13:08:52 UTC 2019


On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 08:43:38AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> The Version tag should be (considered) immutable. Please don't move it.
> 
> If you want to add another tag to help us remember this issue that's fine.
> 
> The other option which Shyam and I discussed was tagging v5.5.

v5.5 or a v5.4.1 would have my preference. That also makes it clear for
packagers that build packages for other distributions and the users that
build from the source tarball.

Niels


> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:32 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <
> atumball at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > We need to tag different commit may be? So the 'git checkout v5.4' points
> > to the correct commit?
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Mar, 2019, 4:40 PM Shyam Ranganathan, <srangana at redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Niels, Kaleb,
> >>
> >> We need to respin 5.4 with the 2 additional commits as follows,
> >>
> >> commit a00953ed212a7071b152c4afccd35b92fa5a682a (HEAD -> release-5,
> >>     core: make compute_cksum function op_version compatible
> >>
> >> commit 8fb4631c65f28dd0a5e0304386efff3c807e64a4
> >>     dict: handle STR_OLD data type in xdr conversions
> >>
> >> As the current build breaks rolling upgrades, we had held back on
> >> announcing 5.4 and are now ready with the fixes that can be used to
> >> respin 5.4.
> >>
> >> Let me know if I need to do anything more from my end for help with the
> >> packaging.
> >>
> >> Once the build is ready, we would be testing it out as usual.
> >>
> >> NOTE: As some users have picked up 5.4 the announce would also carry a
> >> notice, that they need to do a downserver upgrade to the latest bits
> >> owing to the patches that have landed in addition to the existing content.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Shyam
> >>
> >> On 3/5/19 8:59 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> >> > On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org
> >> wrote:
> >> >>> SRC:
> >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz
> >> >>> HASH:
> >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum
> >> >>
> >> >> Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
> >> >> Please try them out and report test results on this list.
> >> >>
> >> >>   # yum install centos-release-gluster
> >> >>   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
> >> >
> >> > Due to patch [1] upgrades are broken, so we are awaiting a fix or revert
> >> > of the same before requesting a new build of 5.4.
> >> >
> >> > The current RPMs should hence not be published.
> >> >
> >> > Sanju/Hari, are we reverting this patch so that we can release 5.4, or
> >> > are we expecting the fix to land in 5.4 (as in [2])?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Shyam
> >> >
> >> > [1] Patch causing regression:
> >> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22148
> >> >
> >> > [2] Proposed fix on master:
> >> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22297/
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > maintainers mailing list
> >> > maintainers at gluster.org
> >> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> maintainers mailing list
> >> maintainers at gluster.org
> >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > maintainers mailing list
> > maintainers at gluster.org
> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> >

> _______________________________________________
> packaging mailing list
> packaging at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging



More information about the maintainers mailing list