[Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS - 6.0RC - Test days (27th, 28th Feb)

[Atin Mukherjee]

I am not sure how BZ 1683815
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1683815> can be a blocker at
RC. We have a fix ready, but to me it doesn't look like a blocker. Vijay -
any objections?

Also the bugzilla dependency of all bugs attached to the release-6 is sort
of messed up. I see most of the times a mainline bug along with its clones
are attached to the tracker which is unnecessary. This has happened because
of default clone but I request every bugzilla assignees to spend few
additional seconds to establish the right dependency.

I have tried to correct few of them and will do the rest by next Monday.
That’d help us to filter out the unnecessary ones and get to know how many
actual blockers we have.

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:51 PM Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com>
wrote:

> On 3/4/19 12:33 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> > On 3/4/19 10:08 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 20:33, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan
> >> <atumball at redhat.com <mailto:atumball at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>     Thanks to those who participated.
> >>
> >>     Update at present:
> >>
> >>     We found 3 blocker bugs in upgrade scenarios, and hence have marked
> >>     release
> >>     as pending upon them. We will keep these lists updated about
> progress.
> >>
> >>
> >> I’d like to clarify that upgrade testing is blocked. So just fixing
> >> these test blocker(s) isn’t enough to call release-6 green. We need to
> >> continue and finish the rest of the upgrade tests once the respective
> >> bugs are fixed.
> >
> > Based on fixes expected by tomorrow for the upgrade fixes, we will build
> > an RC1 candidate on Wednesday (6-Mar) (tagging early Wed. Eastern TZ).
> > This RC can be used for further testing.
>
> There have been no backports for the upgrade failures, request folks
> working on the same to post a list of bugs that need to be fixed, to
> enable tracking the same. (also, ensure they are marked against the
> release-6 tracker [1])
>
> Also, we need to start writing out the upgrade guide for release-6, any
> volunteers for the same?
>
> Thanks,
> Shyam
>
> [1] Release-6 tracker bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-6.0
>
-- 
- Atin (atinm)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20190307/c4ad62c0/attachment.html>