[Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 6: Branched and next steps

Shyam Ranganathan srangana at redhat.com
Wed Feb 20 14:40:12 UTC 2019


On 2/20/19 7:45 AM, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:37 AM Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com
> <mailto:srangana at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>     In preparation for RC0 I have put up an intial patch for the release
>     notes [1]. Request the following actions on the same (either a followup
>     patchset, or a dependent one),
> 
>     - Please review!
>     - Required GD2 section updated to latest GD2 status
> 
> 
> I am inclined to drop the GD2 section for 'standalone' users. As the
> team worked with goals of making GD2 invisible with containers (GCS) in
> mind. So, should we call out any features of GD2 at all?

This is fine, we possibly need to add a note in the release notes, on
the GD2 future and where it would land, so that we can inform users
about the continued use of GD1 in non-GCS use cases.

I will add some text around the same in the release-notes.

> 
> Anyways, as per my previous email on GCS release updates, we are
> planning to have a container available with gd2 and glusterfs, which can
> be used by people who are trying out options with GD2.
>  
> 
>     - Require notes on "Reduce the number or threads used in the brick
>     process" and the actual status of the same in the notes
> 
> 
> This work is still in progress, and we are treating it as a bug fix for
> 'brick-multiplex' usecase, which is mainly required in scaled volume
> number usecase in container world. My guess is, we won't have much
> content to add for glusterfs-6.0 at the moment.

Ack!

>  
> 
>     RC0 build target would be tomorrow or by Wednesday.
> 
> 
> Thanks, I was testing for few upgrade and different version clusters
> support. With 4.1.6 and latest release-6.0 branch, things works fine. I
> haven't done much of a load testing yet. 

Awesome! Helps write out the upgrade guide as well. As this time content
there would/should carry data regarding how to upgrade if any of the
deprecated xlators are in use by a deployment.

> 
> Requesting people to support in upgrade testing. From different volume
> options, and different usecase scenarios.
> 
> Regards,
> Amar
> 
>  
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Shyam
> 
>     [1] Release notes patch: https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22226
> 
>     On 2/5/19 8:25 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > Release 6 is branched, and tracker bug for 6.0 is created [1].
>     >
>     > Do mark blockers for the release against [1].
>     >
>     > As of now we are only tracking [2] "core: implement a global
>     thread pool
>     > " for a backport as a feature into the release.
>     >
>     > We expect to create RC0 tag and builds for upgrade and other testing
>     > close to mid-week next week (around 13th Feb), and the release is
>     slated
>     > for the first week of March for GA.
>     >
>     > I will post updates to this thread around release notes and other
>     > related activity.
>     >
>     > Thanks,
>     > Shyam
>     >
>     > [1] Tracker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-6.0
>     >
>     > [2] Patches tracked for a backport:
>     >   - https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20636
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Gluster-devel mailing list
>     > Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
>     > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>     >
>     _______________________________________________
>     Gluster-devel mailing list
>     Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
>     https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Amar Tumballi (amarts)


More information about the maintainers mailing list