[Gluster-Maintainers] Master branch lock down for stabilization (unlocking the same)

[Shyam Ranganathan]

On 08/14/2018 12:51 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 10:55 PM Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com
> <mailto:srangana at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 08/13/2018 02:20 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>     >     - At the end of 2 weeks, reassess master and nightly test
>     status, and
>     >     see if we need another drive towards stabilizing master by
>     locking down
>     >     the same and focusing only on test and code stability around
>     the same.
>     >
>     >
>     > When will there be a discussion about coming up with guidelines to
>     > prevent lock down in future?
> 
>     A thread for the same is started in the maintainers list.
> 
> 
> Could you point me to the thread please? I am only finding a thread with
> subject "Lock down period merge process"

That is the one I am talking about, where you already raised the above
point (if I recollect right).

> 
>     >
>     > I think it is better to lock-down specific components by removing
>     commit
>     > access for the respective owners for those components when a test in a
>     > particular component starts to fail.
> 
>     Also I suggest we move this to the maintainers thread, to keep the noise
>     levels across lists in check.
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Shyam
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Pranith