[Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 3.11: Has been Branched (and pending feature notes)

Fri May 5 13:11:34 UTC 2017

I merged this and posted the backport merging the two patches into one:
https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17192
Regressions started just now.

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Kaushal M <kshlmster at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Kaushal M <kshlmster at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 03:39:58PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> >>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Kaushal M <kshlmster at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
> >>> > <pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Shyam <srangana at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Hi,
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Release 3.11 for gluster has been branched [1] and tagged [2].
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> We have ~4weeks to release of 3.11, and a week to backport
> features that
> >>> > >> slipped the branching date (May-5th).
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> A tracker BZ [3] has been opened for *blockers* of 3.11 release.
> Request
> >>> > >> that any bug that is determined as a blocker for the release be
> noted
> >>> > as a
> >>> > >> "blocks" against this bug.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> NOTE: Just a heads up, all bugs that are to be backported in the
> next 4
> >>> > >> weeks need not be reflected against the blocker, *only* blocker
> bugs
> >>> > >> identified that should prevent the release, need to be tracked
> against
> >>> > this
> >>> > >> tracker bug.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> We are not building beta1 packages, and will build out RC0
> packages once
> >>> > >> we cross the backport dates. Hence, folks interested in testing
> this
> >>> > out can
> >>> > >> either build from the code or wait for (about) a week longer for
> the
> >>> > >> packages (and initial release notes).
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Features tracked as slipped and expected to be backported by 5th
> May
> >>> > are,
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> 1) [RFE] libfuse rebase to latest? #153 (@amar, @csaba)
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> 2) SELinux support for Gluster Volumes #55 (@ndevos, @jiffin)
> >>> > >>   - Needs a +2 on https://review.gluster.org/13762
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> 3) Enhance handleops readdirplus operation to return handles
> along with
> >>> > >> dirents #174 (@skoduri)
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> 4) Halo - Initial version (@pranith)
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I merged the patch on master. Will send out the port on Thursday.
> I have
> >>> > to
> >>> > > leave like right now to catch train and am on leave tomorrow, so
> will be
> >>> > > back on Thursday and get the port done. Will also try to get the
> other
> >>> > > patches fb guys mentioned post that preferably by 5th itself.
> >>> >
> >>> > Niels found that the HALO patch has pulled in a little bit of the
> IPv6
> >>> > patch. This shouldn't have happened.
> >>> > The IPv6 patch is currently stalled because it depends on an internal
> >>> > FB library. The IPv6 bits that made it in pull this dependency.
> >>> > This would have lead to a -2 on the HALO patch by me, but as I wasn't
> >>> > aware of it, the patch was merged.
> >>> >
> >>> > The IPV6 changes are in rpcsvh.{c,h} and configure.ac, and don't
> seem
> >>> > to affect anything HALO. So they should be easily removable and
> should
> >>> > be removed.
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> As per the configure.ac the macro is enabled only when we are building
> >>> gluster with "--with-fb-extras", which I don't think we do anywhere, so
> >>> didn't think they are important at the moment. Sorry for the confusion
> >>> caused because of this. Thanks to Kaushal for the patch. I will
> backport
> >>> that one as well when I do the 3.11 backport of HALO. So will wait for
> the
> >>> backport until Kaushal's patch is merged.
> >>
> >> Note that there have been disucssions about preventing special vendor
> >> (Red Hat or Facebook) flags and naming. In that sense, --with-fb-extras
> >> is not acceptible. Someone was interested in providing a "site.h"
> >> configuration file that different vendors can use to fine-tune certain
> >> things that are too detailed for ./configure options.
> >>
> >> We should remove the --with-fb-extras as well, specially because it is
> >> not useful for anyone that does not have access to the forked fbtirpc
> >> library.
> >>
> >> Kaushal mentioned he'll update the patch that removed the IPv6 default
> >> define, to also remove the --with-fb-extras and related bits.
> >
> > The patch removing IPV6 and fbextras is at
> > https://review.gluster.org/17174 waiting for regression tests to run.
>
> This has now passed its tests. I don't want to merge my own patch, so
> I'd like it if someone can merge it.
>
> >
> > I've merged the Selinux backports, https://review.gluster.org/17159
> > and https://review.gluster.org/17157 into release-3.11
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Niels
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Thanks,
> >>> > >> Kaushal, Shyam
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> [1] 3.11 Branch: https://github.com/gluster/
> glusterfs/tree/release-3.11
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> [2] Tag for 3.11.0beta1 :
> >>> > >> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/tree/v3.11.0beta1
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> [3] Tracker BZ for 3.11.0 blockers:
> >>> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.11.0
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> _______________________________________________
> >>> > >> maintainers mailing list
> >>> > >> maintainers at gluster.org
> >>> > >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > --
> >>> > > Pranith
> >>> > >
> >>> > > _______________________________________________
> >>> > > Gluster-devel mailing list
> >>> > > Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> >>> > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Pranith
> >>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> maintainers mailing list
> >>> maintainers at gluster.org
> >>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> >>
>

-- 
Pranith
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20170505/71ad909c/attachment.html>