[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers acks needed for 3.7.12

[Kaushal M]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
<rgowdapp at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowdapp at redhat.com>
>> To: "Kaushal M" <kshlmster at gmail.com>
>> Cc: maintainers at gluster.org
>> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 10:16:52 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers acks needed for 3.7.12
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowdapp at redhat.com>
>> > To: "Kaushal M" <kshlmster at gmail.com>
>> > Cc: maintainers at gluster.org
>> > Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 10:10:22 AM
>> > Subject: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers acks needed for 3.7.12
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > From: "Kaushal M" <kshlmster at gmail.com>
>> > > To: maintainers at gluster.org, "Vijay Bellur" <vbellur at redhat.com>
>> > > Cc: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com>, "Raghavendra
>> > > Gowdappa"
>> > > <rgowdapp at redhat.com>, "Xavier Hernandez"
>> > > <xhernandez at datalab.es>
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 7:07:56 PM
>> > > Subject: Re: Maintainers acks needed for 3.7.12
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Kaushal M <kshlmster at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > Hi all,
>> > > >
>> > > > If anyone doesn't know about it yet, the release process for a release
>> > > > has changed. Refer to the mail thread [1] for more information.
>> > > >
>> > > > tl;dr, component maintainers need to now provide an acknowledgement
>> > > > that their component is ready to the release manager, for the manager
>> > > > to make the release. The maintainers are expected to test their
>> > > > components and make sure that it is not obviously broken. In the
>> > > > future, we expect to make this testing automated, which will require
>> > > > maintainers to provide these tests (using DiSTAF).
>> > > >
>> > > > Vijay, who's managing 3.7.12, sent out a call for acks [2], which
>> > > > hasn't recieved any acks apart from the Atin for GlusterD. It is
>> > > > possible that most of you missed this as it was part of another
>> > > > thread.
>> > > >
>> > > > I'm starting this thread as the official call for acks, so that it is
>> > > > more visible to all developers. I cc'd component maintainers (from
>> > > > MAINTAINERS) to make sure no one misses this.
>> > > >
>> > > > Use the tag v3.7.12rc1 to verify your components and provide your acks
>> > > > by replying to this thread.
>> > >
>> > > I'll be doing the release on behalf of Vijay.
>> > > I had hoped to do the release right now (22-Jun-2016 UTC 1330), but
>> > > I'm postponing it to tomorrow, to give my hurting hand some rest.
>> > >
>> > > This gives maintainers a little more time to provide the missing ACKs.
>> > >
>> > > ACKs have been obtained for GlusterD, Geo-Rep, Snapshots, Tiering,
>> > > NFS, transports(tcp,rdma).
>> > >
>> > > Quota has an iffy ACK, as 2 more changes have been requested for
>> > > merging, but they don't have proper all the flags to be merged yet.
>> > > The ACK doesn't say if these 2 changes were included.
>> > >
>> > > Major components yet to recieve ACKs are AFR, DHT and EC.
>>
>> Thanks to QE from Redhat, specifically "Krishnaram Karthick Ramdoss"
>> <kramdoss at redhat.com> and "Anil Shah" <ashah at redhat.com>, we have some
>> sanity tests being run on Quota and DHT (including the list of patches which
>> I compiled). Once the tests are complete, I'll let you know the results.
>
> DHT tests have passed. DHT rebalance tests are still running. The update is that it will take 12+ hours for the tests to complete.
>

Any update on this?

>>
>> > >
>> > > DHT also has a couple of changes that were requested for merging. I've
>> > > merged one, the other doesn't have all the flags.
>> >
>> > Sorry for being illiterate on the flags. What are the flags needed? I can
>> > try
>> > to get them.

The reviews were missing Core-Review+2's.

>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ~kaushal
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > Kaushal
>> > > >
>> > > > [1]
>> > > > https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/2016-April/000679.html
>> > > > [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/2016-June/000847.html
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > maintainers mailing list
>> > maintainers at gluster.org
>> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>> >