[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers acks needed for 3.7.12
kshlmster at gmail.com
Thu Jun 16 06:59:00 UTC 2016
Where these patches merged in with Vijay's approval? Changes should
ideally not be merged by other maintainers when release candidates are
being tracked. This will make the release-maintainers job hard.
In any case, I guess for this time we can do it at the HEAD of
release-3.7, which is commit dca4de3 right now.
I request all maintainers to not merge anymore changes into
release-3.7 till further notice. If you need any change merge, please
inform the release-maintainer, who will take the call on merging it.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Aravinda <avishwan at redhat.com> wrote:
> Thanks Kaushal for the reminder.
> Following patches merged in Geo-rep after v3.7.12rc1, which are required for
> 3.7.12 since these are regressions caused after the merge of
> I will acknowledge the working of Geo-replication components with the above
> mentioned patches. Let me know if that is fine.
> On 06/15/2016 07:37 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> If anyone doesn't know about it yet, the release process for a release
>> has changed. Refer to the mail thread  for more information.
>> tl;dr, component maintainers need to now provide an acknowledgement
>> that their component is ready to the release manager, for the manager
>> to make the release. The maintainers are expected to test their
>> components and make sure that it is not obviously broken. In the
>> future, we expect to make this testing automated, which will require
>> maintainers to provide these tests (using DiSTAF).
>> Vijay, who's managing 3.7.12, sent out a call for acks , which
>> hasn't recieved any acks apart from the Atin for GlusterD. It is
>> possible that most of you missed this as it was part of another
>> I'm starting this thread as the official call for acks, so that it is
>> more visible to all developers. I cc'd component maintainers (from
>> MAINTAINERS) to make sure no one misses this.
>> Use the tag v3.7.12rc1 to verify your components and provide your acks
>> by replying to this thread.
>>  https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/2016-April/000679.html
>>  https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/2016-June/000847.html
More information about the maintainers