[Gluster-Maintainers] Release scheduling and lifecycle of versions
rfontana at redhat.com
Wed Jun 15 03:59:06 UTC 2016
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:02:12PM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> But we don't need to guess, we can just ask our resident legal
> counsel, who wi ll tell us if there are any implications to calling
> our planned long life cycle release of Community GlusterFS an "LTS
> Off hand I wouldn't expect there to be, but––
> Richard (and Ric) what, if any, implications are there? Should we pick a different name?
No objection to "LTS" from me. I do not consider the 'S" to imply
"commercial support" if that's what the concern is (but even if it
did, that would not create any legal issue). I defer to Ric on whether
there could be some non-legal concern around using "LTS".
More information about the maintainers