[Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-3.8: User understandable release note needed for new CLI command for ESH

Niels de Vos ndevos at redhat.com
Mon Dec 12 07:08:28 UTC 2016


On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:21:42AM +0530, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 09:52:04AM +0530, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
...
> > > ... speaking of which, can we wait till http://review.gluster.org/#/c/
> > 16075/
> > > is also merged into 3.8 before making
> > > the release? Although the bug is in AFR core, the likelihood of hitting
> > the
> > > bug is more with granular entry heal
> > > than without it. And I know of at least 3 users who are using the feature
> > > already on their production system.
> > > Otherwise we might have to wait one more month for the fix to be taken
> > in,
> > > which is quite late IMO.
> >
> > I do not see a cloned bug for 3.8.7 yet? Could you clone the bug for
> > mainline and add "glusterfs-3.8.7" in the blocks field of the new BZ?
> >
> 
> Thank you! Here it is - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403646

Can you give me a hint on when you expect that the patch should be
available and reviewed for the 3.8 branch?

Niels


> 
> -Krutika
> 
> 
> > Thanks,
> > Niels
> >
> > >
> > > -Krutika
> > >
> > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Could you please pass me a few lines that are understandable for users
> > > > so that they know when/if they should enable/disable the new
> > > > granular-entry-heal option?
> > > >
> > > > The bug does not explain a lot, and the commit message is not very user
> > > > friendly:
> > > >   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398501#c4
> > > >
> > > > It helps to know what kind of errors/warnings are produced, and what
> > the
> > > > recommended action is.
> > > >
> > > > I'll wait with pushing the release-notes for 3.8.7 until I have more
> > > > details. This obviously blocks the release as well.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Niels
> > > >
> >


More information about the maintainers mailing list