[Gluster-users] 2 issues after upgrade 9.4 -> 10.1
Hu Bert
revirii at googlemail.com
Tue Mar 1 09:39:57 UTC 2022
Hey,
ok, i think i found the reason for the port issue:
https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/release-notes/10.0/
https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/786
Should've look closer... mea culpa. But, quite interesting, that
happened only on one server, i upgraded 6 servers in total.
So only the issue with the glusterfs mount and backup-volfile-servers remains.
Thx,
Hubert
Am Di., 1. März 2022 um 06:19 Uhr schrieb Hu Bert <revirii at googlemail.com>:
>
> Good morning,
>
> just did an upgrade of 3 gluster volumes and x clients from 9.4 to
> 10.1. In principle the upgrade went fine, just 2 smaller issues
> appeared.
>
> 1) on one of the servers the ports are screwed up.
>
> gluster volume status
> Status of volume: workdata
> Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Brick glusterpub1:/gluster/md3/workdata 49152 0 Y 1452
> Brick glusterpub2:/gluster/md3/workdata 49152 0 Y 1839
> Brick glusterpub3:/gluster/md3/workdata 54105 0 Y 1974
> Brick glusterpub1:/gluster/md4/workdata 49153 0 Y 1459
> Brick glusterpub2:/gluster/md4/workdata 49153 0 Y 1849
> Brick glusterpub3:/gluster/md4/workdata 58177 0 Y 1997
> Brick glusterpub1:/gluster/md5/workdata 49154 0 Y 1468
> Brick glusterpub2:/gluster/md5/workdata 49154 0 Y 1857
> Brick glusterpub3:/gluster/md5/workdata 59071 0 Y 2003
> Brick glusterpub1:/gluster/md6/workdata 49155 0 Y 1481
> Brick glusterpub2:/gluster/md6/workdata 49155 0 Y 1868
> Brick glusterpub3:/gluster/md6/workdata 53309 0 Y 2008
> Brick glusterpub1:/gluster/md7/workdata 49156 0 Y 1490
> Brick glusterpub2:/gluster/md7/workdata 49156 0 Y 1878
> Brick glusterpub3:/gluster/md7/workdata 54310 0 Y 2027
> Self-heal Daemon on localhost N/A N/A Y 2108
> Self-heal Daemon on glusterpub1 N/A N/A Y 1210749
> Self-heal Daemon on glusterpub2 N/A N/A Y 950871
>
> Task Status of Volume workdata
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> There are no active volume tasks
>
> glusterpub3 has different ports. I know, this is no problem, the
> volume is good, but even after a reboot the ports stay like this.
>
> glustershd.log:
> [2022-03-01 04:58:13.993349 +0000] I
> [rpc-clnt.c:1969:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 0-workdata-client-0: changing port
> to 49152 (from 0)
> [2022-03-01 04:58:13.993410 +0000] I [socket.c:834:__socket_shutdown]
> 0-workdata-client-0: intentional socket shutdown(13)
> [............]
> [2022-03-01 04:58:14.008111 +0000] I
> [rpc-clnt.c:1969:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 0-workdata-client-1: changing port
> to 49152 (from 0)
> [2022-03-01 04:58:14.008148 +0000] I [socket.c:834:__socket_shutdown]
> 0-workdata-client-1: intentional socket shutdown(14)
> [............]
> [2022-03-01 04:58:14.011416 +0000] I
> [rpc-clnt.c:1969:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 0-workdata-client-2: changing port
> to 54105 (from 0)
> [2022-03-01 04:58:14.011469 +0000] I [socket.c:834:__socket_shutdown]
> 0-workdata-client-2: intentional socket shutdown(13)
>
> same for the other 4 bricks. Probably some more related message,
> unsure which ones to c+p. And some error messages like these (appear
> on all servers):
>
> [2022-03-01 04:58:14.012523 +0000] E
> [rpc-clnt.c:331:saved_frames_unwind] (-->
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(_gf_log_callingfn+0x195)[0x7f4cec48c2a5]
> (--> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfrpc.so.0(+0x729c)[0x7f4cec42529c] (-->
> /lib/
> x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_connection_cleanup+0x10f)[0x7f4cec42d20f]
> (--> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfrpc.so.0(+0x10118)[0x7f4cec42e118]
> (--> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_transport_notify+0x26)[0x7f4cec429646]
> )))
> )) 0-workdata-client-5: forced unwinding frame type(GF-DUMP)
> op(DUMP(1)) called at 2022-03-01 04:58:14.011943 +0000 (xid=0x5)
>
> very strange.
>
> 2) when mounting on the clients (after upgrade):
>
> /sbin/mount.glusterfs: 90: [: glusterpub2 glusterpub3 SyntaxOK:
> unexpected operator
> /sbin/mount.glusterfs: 366: [: SyntaxOK: unexpected operator
>
> Syntax ok, but unexpected operator? Has the mount syntax changed?
>
> glusterpub1:/workdata /data/repository/shared/public glusterfs
> defaults,_netdev,attribute-timeout=0,entry-timeout=0,backup-volfile-servers=glusterpub2:glusterpub3
> 0 0
>
>
> thx,
> Hubert
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list