[Gluster-users] 回复: Re: not support so called “structured data”

[sz_cuitao at 163.com]

thank you for your answer.

I don't like the document of the project.In fact,many open source projects do not having a good document system.
For exmaple,the version of doc does not match with the feature and some topic in the doc is outdated.

At this point,commercial software does more better.



sz_cuitao at 163.com
 
发件人： Strahil Nikolov
发送时间： 2020-04-02 12:27
收件人： gluster-users; sz_cuitao at 163.com
主题： Re: [Gluster-users] not support so called “structured data”
On April 2, 2020 5:24:39 AM GMT+03:00, "sz_cuitao at 163.com" <sz_cuitao at 163.com> wrote:
>Document point out:
>Gluster does not support so called “structured data”, meaning live, SQL
>databases. Of course, using Gluster to backup and restore the database
>would be fine.
>
>What? Not,support!
>I had a test to run Oracle database on KVM/Ovirt/Gluster,it works
>well,in fact.
>
>But why docs says not support ? It measn not suggest or not to use ?
>
>
>
>
>
>sz_cuitao at 163.com
 
I don't know why this is written ,  but when I checked this doc:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_gluster_storage/3.1/html/console_installation_guide/add_database_server_to_rhgs-c  
 
it seems pretty legid workload (no matter postgres, mysql, mariadb, oracle,hana,etc)   .
 
The only thing that comes to my mind is that usually DBs are quite valuable and thus a 'replica 3' volume or a 'replica 3 arbiter 1' volume should be used and a different set of options are needed  (compared  to other workloads).
 
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20200402/fc4e2859/attachment.html>