[Gluster-users] Rebalancing newly added bricks
Strahil Nikolov
hunter86_bg at yahoo.com
Fri Sep 6 18:32:54 UTC 2019
As it was mentioned, you might have to run rebalance on the other node - but it is better to wait this node is over.
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
В петък, 6 септември 2019 г., 15:29:20 ч. Гринуич+3, Herb Burnswell <herbert.burnswell at gmail.com> написа:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:56 PM Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 02:41, Herb Burnswell <herbert.burnswell at gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for the replies. The rebalance is running and the brick percentages are not adjusting as expected:
# df -hP |grep data
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv1_data 60T 49T 11T 83% /gluster_bricks/data1
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv2_data 60T 49T 11T 83% /gluster_bricks/data2
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv3_data 60T 4.6T 55T 8% /gluster_bricks/data3
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv4_data 60T 4.6T 55T 8% /gluster_bricks/data4
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv5_data 60T 4.6T 55T 8% /gluster_bricks/data5
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv6_data 60T 4.6T 55T 8% /gluster_bricks/data6
At the current pace it looks like this will continue to run for another 5-6 days.
I appreciate the guidance..
What is the output of the rebalance status command?Can you check if there are any errors in the rebalance logs on the node on which you see rebalance activity?If there are a lot of small files on the volume, the rebalance is expected to take time.
Regards,Nithya
My apologies, that was a typo. I meant to say:
"The rebalance is running and the brick percentages are NOW adjusting as expected"
I did expect the rebalance to take several days. The rebalance log is not showing any errors. Status output:
# gluster vol rebalance tank status
Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s
--------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ --------------
localhost 1251320 35.5TB 2079527 0 0 in progress 139:9:46
serverB 0 0Bytes 7 0 0 completed 63:47:55
volume rebalance: tank: success
Thanks again for the guidance.
HB
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:08 PM Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote:
On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 at 22:59, Herb Burnswell <herbert.burnswell at gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you for the reply.
I started a rebalance with force on serverA as suggested. Now I see 'activity' on that node:
# gluster vol rebalance tank status
Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s
--------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ --------------
localhost 6143 6.1GB 9542 0 0 in progress 0:4:5
serverB 0 0Bytes 7 0 0 in progress 0:4:5
volume rebalance: tank: success
But I am not seeing any activity on serverB. Is this expected? Does the rebalance need to run on each node even though it says both nodes are 'in progress'?
It looks like this is a replicate volume. If that is the case then yes, you are running an old version of Gluster for which this was the default behaviour.
Regards,Nithya
Thanks,
HB
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 4:18 AM Strahil <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com> wrote:
The rebalance status show 0 Bytes.
Maybe you should try with the 'gluster volume rebalance <VOLNAME> start force' ?
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
Source: https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Managing%20Volumes/#rebalancing-volumes
On Aug 30, 2019 20:04, Herb Burnswell <herbert.burnswell at gmail.com> wrote:
All,
RHEL 7.5Gluster 3.8.152 Nodes: serverA & serverB
I am not deeply knowledgeable about Gluster and it's administration but we have a 2 node cluster that's been running for about a year and a half. All has worked fine to date. Our main volume has consisted of two 60TB bricks on each of the cluster nodes. As we reached capacity on the volume we needed to expand. So, we've added four new 60TB bricks to each of the cluster nodes. The bricks are now seen, and the total size of the volume is as expected:
# gluster vol status tank
Status of volume: tank
Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick serverA:/gluster_bricks/data1 49162 0 Y 20318
Brick serverB:/gluster_bricks/data1 49166 0 Y 3432
Brick serverA:/gluster_bricks/data2 49163 0 Y 20323
Brick serverB:/gluster_bricks/data2 49167 0 Y 3435
Brick serverA:/gluster_bricks/data3 49164 0 Y 4625
Brick serverA:/gluster_bricks/data4 49165 0 Y 4644
Brick serverA:/gluster_bricks/data5 49166 0 Y 5088
Brick serverA:/gluster_bricks/data6 49167 0 Y 5128
Brick serverB:/gluster_bricks/data3 49168 0 Y 22314
Brick serverB:/gluster_bricks/data4 49169 0 Y 22345
Brick serverB:/gluster_bricks/data5 49170 0 Y 22889
Brick serverB:/gluster_bricks/data6 49171 0 Y 22932
Self-heal Daemon on localhost N/A N/A Y 22981
Self-heal Daemon on serverA.example.com N/A N/A Y 6202
After adding the bricks we ran a rebalance from serverA as:
# gluster volume rebalance tank start
The rebalance completed:
# gluster volume rebalance tank status
Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s
--------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ --------------
localhost 0 0Bytes 0 0 0 completed 3:7:10
serverA.example.com 0 0Bytes 0 0 0 completed 0:0:0
volume rebalance: tank: success
However, when I run a df, the two original bricks still show all of the consumed space (this is the same on both nodes):
# df -hP
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/vg0-root 5.0G 625M 4.4G 13% /
devtmpfs 32G 0 32G 0% /dev
tmpfs 32G 0 32G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs 32G 67M 32G 1% /run
tmpfs 32G 0 32G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/mapper/vg0-usr 20G 3.6G 17G 18% /usr
/dev/md126 1014M 228M 787M 23% /boot
/dev/mapper/vg0-home 5.0G 37M 5.0G 1% /home
/dev/mapper/vg0-opt 5.0G 37M 5.0G 1% /opt
/dev/mapper/vg0-tmp 5.0G 33M 5.0G 1% /tmp
/dev/mapper/vg0-var 20G 2.6G 18G 13% /var
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv1_data 60T 59T 1.1T 99% /gluster_bricks/data1
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv2_data 60T 58T 1.3T 98% /gluster_bricks/data2
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv3_data 60T 451M 60T 1% /gluster_bricks/data3
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv4_data 60T 451M 60T 1% /gluster_bricks/data4
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv5_data 60T 451M 60T 1% /gluster_bricks/data5
/dev/mapper/gluster_vg-gluster_lv6_data 60T 451M 60T 1% /gluster_bricks/data6
localhost:/tank 355T 116T 239T 33% /mnt/tank
We were thinking that the used space would be distributed across the now 6 bricks after rebalance. Is that not what a rebalance does? Is this expected behavior?
Can anyone provide some guidance as to what the behavior here and if there is anything that we need to do at this point?
Thanks in advance,
HB
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users at gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users at gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users at gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20190906/39224d55/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list