[Gluster-users] Proposing to previous ganesha HA cluster solution back to gluster code as gluster-7 feature

Jiffin Tony Thottan jthottan at redhat.com
Fri May 3 06:04:50 UTC 2019

On 30/04/19 6:41 PM, Renaud Fortier wrote:
> IMO, you should keep storhaug and maintain it. At the beginning, we 
> were with pacemaker and corosync. Then we move to storhaug with the 
> upgrade to gluster 4.1.x. Now you are talking about going back like it 
> was. Maybe it will be better with pacemake and corosync but the 
> important is to have a solution that will be stable and maintained.

I agree it is very frustrating, there is no longer development planned 
for future unless someone pick it and work on for its stabilization and 

My plan is just to get back what gluster and nfs-ganesha had before



> thanks
> Renaud
> *De :*gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org 
> [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] *De la part de* Jim Kinney
> *Envoyé :* 30 avril 2019 08:20
> *À :* gluster-users at gluster.org; Jiffin Tony Thottan 
> <jthottan at redhat.com>; gluster-users at gluster.org; Gluster Devel 
> <gluster-devel at gluster.org>; gluster-maintainers at gluster.org; 
> nfs-ganesha <nfs-ganesha at redhat.com>; devel at lists.nfs-ganesha.org
> *Objet :* Re: [Gluster-users] Proposing to previous ganesha HA cluster 
> solution back to gluster code as gluster-7 feature
> +1!
> I'm using nfs-ganesha in my next upgrade so my client systems can use 
> NFS instead of fuse mounts. Having an integrated, designed in process 
> to coordinate multiple nodes into an HA cluster will very welcome.
> On April 30, 2019 3:20:11 AM EDT, Jiffin Tony Thottan 
> <jthottan at redhat.com <mailto:jthottan at redhat.com>> wrote:
>     Hi all,
>     Some of you folks may be familiar with HA solution provided for
>     nfs-ganesha by gluster using pacemaker and corosync.
>     That feature was removed in glusterfs 3.10 in favour for common HA
>     project "Storhaug". Even Storhaug was not progressed
>     much from last two years and current development is in halt state,
>     hence planning to restore old HA ganesha solution back
>     to gluster code repository with some improvement and targetting
>     for next gluster release 7.
>     I have opened up an issue [1] with details and posted initial set
>     of patches [2]
>     Please share your thoughts on the same
>     Regards,
>     Jiffin
>     [1]https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/663
>     <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/663>
>     [2]
>     https://review.gluster.org/#/q/topic:rfc-663+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
> -- 
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. All tyopes are thumb 
> related and reflect authenticity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20190503/e06fb039/attachment.html>

More information about the Gluster-users mailing list