[Gluster-users] Recommended gluster stable version

[Strahil]

Hi Kaleb,

I would recommend you v6.
Curently I'm running hyperconverged setup with oVirt (latest) + gluster v6.3 and everything is quite well.
Also, keep in mind there multiple enhancements adopted with v6 and if any issue arise - the dev will prioritize it.

Also, v6 will have longer support compared to the other options, which means that you will have plenty of time before you have to think about migration.


Best Regards,
Strahil NikolovOn Jul 23, 2019 14:21, Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 4:36 AM Gionatan Danti <g.danti at assyoma.it> wrote:
>>
>> Hi list,
>> I have a question about recommended gluster stable version for using to 
>> host virtual disk images.
>>
>>  From my understanding, current RHGS uses the latest 3.x gluster branch. 
>> This is also the same version provided by default in RHEL/CentOS;
>>
>> [root at localhost ~]# yum info glusterfs.x86_64
>> ...
>> Name        : glusterfs
>> Arch        : x86_64
>> Version     : 3.12.2
>> Release     : 18.el7
>> Size        : 542 k
>> Repo        : base/7/x86_64
>> ...
>>
>> At the same time, CentOS SIG enables version 4.0, 4.1, 5.x and 6.x. 
>
>
>
> That's true, but the glusterfs-3.12.x packages are still available on the CentOS mirrors.
>
> I'm not sure why the centos-release-gluster312 package has been removed from the mirrors, but you can still get it from https://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6530
>
> It seems odd to me that centos-release-gluster312 would have been removed when RHEL is still shipping — for a little while longer anyway — glusterfs-3.12 (client side) packages.
>
> --
>
> Kaleb
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20190723/3e2774c9/attachment.html>