<p dir="ltr">Hi Kaleb,</p>
<p dir="ltr">I would recommend you v6.<br>
Curently I'm running hyperconverged setup with oVirt (latest) + gluster v6.3 and everything is quite well.<br>
Also, keep in mind there multiple enhancements adopted with v6 and if any issue arise - the dev will prioritize it.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Also, v6 will have longer support compared to the other options, which means that you will have plenty of time before you have to think about migration.<br></p>
<p dir="ltr">Best Regards,<br>
Strahil Nikolov</p>
<div class="quote">On Jul 23, 2019 14:21, Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle@redhat.com> wrote:<br type='attribution'><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br /></div><br /><div class="elided-text"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 4:36 AM Gionatan Danti <<a href="mailto:g.danti@assyoma.it">g.danti@assyoma.it</a>> wrote:<br /></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb( 204 , 204 , 204 );padding-left:1ex">Hi list,<br />
I have a question about recommended gluster stable version for using to <br />
host virtual disk images.<br />
<br />
From my understanding, current RHGS uses the latest 3.x gluster branch. <br />
This is also the same version provided by default in RHEL/CentOS;<br />
<br />
[root@localhost ~]# yum info glusterfs.x86_64<br />
...<br />
Name : glusterfs<br />
Arch : x86_64<br />
Version : 3.12.2<br />
Release : 18.el7<br />
Size : 542 k<br />
Repo : base/7/x86_64<br />
...<br />
<br />
At the same time, CentOS SIG enables version 4.0, 4.1, 5.x and 6.x. <br /></blockquote><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>That's true, but the glusterfs-3.12.x packages are still available on the CentOS mirrors.</div><div><br /></div><div>I'm not sure why the centos-release-gluster312 package has been removed from the mirrors, but you can still get it from <a href="https://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6530">https://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6530</a></div><div><br /></div><div>It seems odd to me that centos-release-gluster312 would have been removed when RHEL is still shipping — for a little while longer anyway — glusterfs-3.12 (client side) packages.</div><div><br /></div><div>--</div><div><br /></div><div>Kaleb</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div>