[Gluster-users] To good to be truth speed improvements?

Artem Russakovskii archon810 at gmail.com
Fri Jan 18 15:33:51 UTC 2019

I actually have 4 bricks with no arbiters. Fixed quorum count of 1 assures
the files will be accessible even if all but 1 brick go down. Performance
is good enough, though it can always be better, of course.

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019, 5:37 AM Andreas Davour <ante at update.uu.se wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019, Diego Remolina wrote:
> > The OP (me) has a two node setup. I am not sure how many nodes in Artem's
> > configuration (he is running 4.0.2).
> >
> > It can make sense that the more bricks you have, the higher the
> performance
> > hit in certain conditions, given that supposedly one of the issues of
> > gluster with many small files is that gluster has to stat the files in
> all
> > the bricks (I would assume where they reside), so this is what creates
> the
> > high latencies which lead to bad performance with many small files.
> >
> > I am no expert on the internals of how it works, so I am not 100% sure
> > though.
> Ah! Look at that. I mixed up you and Artem. Sorry about that!
> /andreas
> --
> "economics is a pseudoscience; the astrology of our time"
> Kim Stanley Robinson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20190118/fd565d17/attachment.html>

More information about the Gluster-users mailing list