[Gluster-users] [External] Re: Input/output error on FUSE log

Mon Jan 7 18:55:29 UTC 2019

then my last idea would be trying to create the same files or run the
application on the other volumes, sorry but i will be interested in the
solution!

On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 7:52 PM Matt Waymack <mwaymack at nsgdv.com> wrote:

> Yep, first unmount/remounted, then rebooted clients.  Stopped/started the
> volumes, and rebooted all nodes.
>
>
>
> *From:* Davide Obbi <davide.obbi at booking.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, January 7, 2019 12:47 PM
> *To:* Matt Waymack <mwaymack at nsgdv.com>
> *Cc:* Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com>;
> gluster-users at gluster.org List <gluster-users at gluster.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [External] Re: [Gluster-users] Input/output error on FUSE
> log
>
>
>
> i guess you tried already unmounting, stop/star and mounting?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 7:44 PM Matt Waymack <mwaymack at nsgdv.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, all volumes use sharding.
>
>
>
> *From:* Davide Obbi <davide.obbi at booking.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, January 7, 2019 12:43 PM
> *To:* Matt Waymack <mwaymack at nsgdv.com>
> *Cc:* Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com>;
> gluster-users at gluster.org List <gluster-users at gluster.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [External] Re: [Gluster-users] Input/output error on FUSE
> log
>
>
>
> are all the volumes being configured with sharding?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 5:35 PM Matt Waymack <mwaymack at nsgdv.com> wrote:
>
> I think that I can rule out network as I have multiple volumes on the same
> nodes and not all volumes are affected.  Additionally, access via SMB using
> samba-vfs-glusterfs is not affected, even on the same volumes.   This is
> seemingly only affecting the FUSE clients.
>
>
>
> *From:* Davide Obbi <davide.obbi at booking.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, January 6, 2019 12:26 PM
> *To:* Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com>
> *Cc:* Matt Waymack <mwaymack at nsgdv.com>; gluster-users at gluster.org List <
> gluster-users at gluster.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [External] Re: [Gluster-users] Input/output error on FUSE
> log
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> i would start doing some checks like: "(Input/output error)" seems
> returned by the operating system, this happens for instance trying to
> access a file system which is on a device not available so i would check
> the network connectivity between the client to servers  and server to
> server during the reported time.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Davide
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 3:32 AM Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 7:58 AM Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 4:19 AM Matt Waymack <mwaymack at nsgdv.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I'm having a problem writing to our volume.  When writing files larger
> than about 2GB, I get an intermittent issue where the write will fail and
> return Input/Output error.  This is also shown in the FUSE log of the
> client (this is affecting all clients).  A snip of a client log is below:
>
> [2019-01-05 22:39:44.581371] W [fuse-bridge.c:2474:fuse_writev_cbk]
> 0-glusterfs-fuse: 51040978: WRITE => -1
> gfid=82a0b5c4-7ef3-43c2-ad86-41e16673d7c2 fd=0x7f949839a368 (Input/output
> error)
>
> [2019-01-05 22:39:44.598392] W [fuse-bridge.c:1441:fuse_err_cbk]
> 0-glusterfs-fuse: 51040979: FLUSH() ERR => -1 (Input/output error)
>
> [2019-01-05 22:39:47.420920] W [fuse-bridge.c:2474:fuse_writev_cbk]
> 0-glusterfs-fuse: 51041266: WRITE => -1
> gfid=0e8e1e13-97a5-478a-bc58-e81ddf3698a3 fd=0x7f949809b7f8 (Input/output
> error)
>
> [2019-01-05 22:39:47.433377] W [fuse-bridge.c:1441:fuse_err_cbk]
> 0-glusterfs-fuse: 51041267: FLUSH() ERR => -1 (Input/output error)
>
> [2019-01-05 22:39:50.441531] W [fuse-bridge.c:2474:fuse_writev_cbk]
> 0-glusterfs-fuse: 51041548: WRITE => -1
> gfid=0e8e1e13-97a5-478a-bc58-e81ddf3698a3 fd=0x7f949839a368 (Input/output
> error)
>
> [2019-01-05 22:39:50.451914] W [fuse-bridge.c:1441:fuse_err_cbk]
> 0-glusterfs-fuse: 51041549: FLUSH() ERR => -1 (Input/output error)
>
> The message "W [MSGID: 109011] [dht-layout.c:163:dht_layout_search]
> 0-gv1-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 1311504267" repeated 1721 times
> between [2019-01-05 22:39:33.906241] and [2019-01-05 22:39:44.598371]
>
> The message "E [MSGID: 101046] [dht-common.c:1502:dht_lookup_dir_cbk]
> 0-gv1-dht: dict is null" repeated 1714 times between [2019-01-05
> 22:39:33.925981] and [2019-01-05 22:39:50.451862]
>
> The message "W [MSGID: 109011] [dht-layout.c:163:dht_layout_search]
> 0-gv1-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 1137142622" repeated 1707 times
> between [2019-01-05 22:39:39.636552] and [2019-01-05 22:39:50.451895]
>
>
>
> This looks to be a DHT issue. Some questions:
>
> * Are all subvolumes of DHT up and client is connected to them?
> Particularly the subvolume which contains the file in question.
>
> * Can you get all extended attributes of parent directory of the file from
> all bricks?
>
> * set diagnostics.client-log-level to TRACE, capture these errors again
> and attach the client log file.
>
>
>
> I spoke a bit early. dht_writev doesn't search hashed subvolume as its
> already been looked up in lookup. So, these msgs looks to be of a different
> issue - not  writev failure.
>
>
>
>
>
> This is intermittent for most files, but eventually if a file is large
> enough it will not write.  The workflow is SFTP tot he client which then
> writes to the volume over FUSE.  When files get to a certain point,w e can
> no longer write to them.  The file sizes are different as well, so it's not
> like they all get to the same size and just stop either.  I've ruled out a
> free space issue, our files at their largest are only a few hundred GB and
> we have tens of terrabytes free on each brick.  We are also sharding at 1GB.
>
>
>
> I'm not sure where to go from here as the error seems vague and I can only
> see it on the client log.  I'm not seeing these errors on the nodes
> themselves.  This is also seen if I mount the volume via FUSE on any of the
> nodes as well and it is only reflected in the FUSE log.
>
>
>
> Here is the volume info:
>
> Volume Name: gv1
>
> Type: Distributed-Replicate
>
> Volume ID: 1472cc78-e2a0-4c3f-9571-dab840239b3c
>
> Status: Started
>
> Snapshot Count: 0
>
> Number of Bricks: 8 x (2 + 1) = 24
>
> Transport-type: tcp
>
> Bricks:
>
> Brick1: tpc-glus4:/exp/b1/gv1
>
> Brick2: tpc-glus2:/exp/b1/gv1
>
> Brick3: tpc-arbiter1:/exp/b1/gv1 (arbiter)
>
> Brick4: tpc-glus2:/exp/b2/gv1
>
> Brick5: tpc-glus4:/exp/b2/gv1
>
> Brick6: tpc-arbiter1:/exp/b2/gv1 (arbiter)
>
> Brick7: tpc-glus4:/exp/b3/gv1
>
> Brick8: tpc-glus2:/exp/b3/gv1
>
> Brick9: tpc-arbiter1:/exp/b3/gv1 (arbiter)
>
> Brick10: tpc-glus4:/exp/b4/gv1
>
> Brick11: tpc-glus2:/exp/b4/gv1
>
> Brick12: tpc-arbiter1:/exp/b4/gv1 (arbiter)
>
> Brick13: tpc-glus1:/exp/b5/gv1
>
> Brick14: tpc-glus3:/exp/b5/gv1
>
> Brick15: tpc-arbiter2:/exp/b5/gv1 (arbiter)
>
> Brick16: tpc-glus1:/exp/b6/gv1
>
> Brick17: tpc-glus3:/exp/b6/gv1
>
> Brick18: tpc-arbiter2:/exp/b6/gv1 (arbiter)
>
> Brick19: tpc-glus1:/exp/b7/gv1
>
> Brick20: tpc-glus3:/exp/b7/gv1
>
> Brick21: tpc-arbiter2:/exp/b7/gv1 (arbiter)
>
> Brick22: tpc-glus1:/exp/b8/gv1
>
> Brick23: tpc-glus3:/exp/b8/gv1
>
> Brick24: tpc-arbiter2:/exp/b8/gv1 (arbiter)
>
> Options Reconfigured:
>
> performance.cache-samba-metadata: on
>
> performance.cache-invalidation: off
>
> features.shard-block-size: 1000MB
>
> features.shard: on
>
> transport.address-family: inet
>
> nfs.disable: on
>
> cluster.lookup-optimize: on
>
>
>
> I'm a bit stumped on this, any help is appreciated.  Thank you!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Davide Obbi*
>
> Senior System Administrator
>
> Booking.com B.V.
> Vijzelstraat 66-80 Amsterdam 1017HL Netherlands
>
> Direct +31207031558
>
> *[image: Booking.com] <https://www.booking.com/>*
>
> Empowering people to experience the world since 1996
>
> 43 languages, 214+ offices worldwide, 141,000+ global destinations, 29
> million reported listings
> Subsidiary of Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG)
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Davide Obbi*
>
> Senior System Administrator
>
> Booking.com B.V.
> Vijzelstraat 66-80 Amsterdam 1017HL Netherlands
>
> Direct +31207031558
>
> *[image: Booking.com] <https://www.booking.com/>*
>
> Empowering people to experience the world since 1996
>
> 43 languages, 214+ offices worldwide, 141,000+ global destinations, 29
> million reported listings
> Subsidiary of Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG)
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Davide Obbi*
>
> Senior System Administrator
>
> Booking.com B.V.
> Vijzelstraat 66-80 Amsterdam 1017HL Netherlands
>
> Direct +31207031558
>
> *[image: Booking.com] <https://www.booking.com/>*
>
> Empowering people to experience the world since 1996
>
> 43 languages, 214+ offices worldwide, 141,000+ global destinations, 29
> million reported listings
> Subsidiary of Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG)
>

-- 
Davide Obbi
Senior System Administrator

Booking.com B.V.
Vijzelstraat 66-80 Amsterdam 1017HL Netherlands
Direct +31207031558
[image: Booking.com] <https://www.booking.com/>
Empowering people to experience the world since 1996
43 languages, 214+ offices worldwide, 141,000+ global destinations, 29
million reported listings
Subsidiary of Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20190107/491108e8/attachment.html>