[Gluster-users] Proposing to previous ganesha HA cluster solution back to gluster code as gluster-7 feature

[Jim Kinney]

+1!
I'm using nfs-ganesha in my next upgrade so my client systems can use NFS instead of fuse mounts. Having an integrated, designed in process to coordinate multiple nodes into an HA cluster will very welcome.

On April 30, 2019 3:20:11 AM EDT, Jiffin Tony Thottan <jthottan at redhat.com> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Some of you folks may be familiar with HA solution provided for 
>nfs-ganesha by gluster using pacemaker and corosync.
>
>That feature was removed in glusterfs 3.10 in favour for common HA 
>project "Storhaug". Even Storhaug was not progressed
>
>much from last two years and current development is in halt state,
>hence 
>planning to restore old HA ganesha solution back
>
>to gluster code repository with some improvement and targetting for
>next 
>gluster release 7.
>
>I have opened up an issue [1] with details and posted initial set of 
>patches [2]
>
>Please share your thoughts on the same
>
>Regards,
>
>Jiffin
>
>[1]https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/663 
><https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/663>
>
>[2] 
>https://review.gluster.org/#/q/topic:rfc-663+(status:open+OR+status:merged)

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. All tyopes are thumb related and reflect authenticity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20190430/bc40d5d6/attachment.html>