[Gluster-users] Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)

Sam McLeod mailinglists at smcleod.net
Mon Mar 19 00:20:14 UTC 2018


Hi Tom,

Thanks for your reply.

1. Yes XFS is on a LUKs LV (see below).
2. Yes, I prefer FIO but each Gluster host gets between 50-100K 4K random IOP/s both write and read to disk.
3. Yes, we actually use 2x 10Gbit DACs in LACP, but we get full 10Gbit speeds (and very low latency thanks to the DACs).
4. I'd love to see that, it'd be much appreciated thanks.



# lsblk
NAME                           MAJ:MIN RM  SIZE RO TYPE  MOUNTPOINT
xvdc                           202:32   0  1.5T  0 disk
└─xvdc1                        202:33   0  1.5T  0 part
  └─gluster-storage            253:1    0    3T  0 lvm
    └─gluster-storage-unlocked 253:3    0    3T  0 crypt /mnt/gluster-storage
xvda                           202:0    0   18G  0 disk
├─xvda2                        202:2    0 17.5G  0 part
│ ├─centos-var                 253:2    0  9.5G  0 lvm   /var
│ └─centos-root                253:0    0    8G  0 lvm   /
└─xvda1                        202:1    0  500M  0 part  /boot
sr0                             11:0    1 1024M  0 rom
xvdb                           202:16   0  1.5T  0 disk
└─xvdb1                        202:17   0  1.5T  0 part
  └─gluster-storage            253:1    0    3T  0 lvm
    └─gluster-storage-unlocked 253:3    0    3T  0 crypt /mnt/gluster-storage

--
Sam McLeod
Please respond via email when possible.
https://smcleod.net
https://twitter.com/s_mcleod

> On 19 Mar 2018, at 10:37 am, TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote:
> 
> On 3/18/2018 6:13 PM, Sam McLeod wrote:
> Even your NFS transfers are 12.5 or so MB per second or less.
> 
> 1) Did you use fdisk and LVM under that XFS filesystem?
> 
> 2) Did you benchmark the XFS with something like bonnie++?  (There's probably newer benchmark suites now.)
> 
> 3) Did you benchmark your Network transfer speeds?  Perhaps your NIC negotiated a lower speed.
> 
> 3) I've done XFS tuning for another purpose but got good results.  If it helps, I can send you the doc.
> 
> Cheers,
> Tom
> 
>> Howdy all,
>> We're experiencing terrible small file performance when copying or moving files on gluster clients.
>> In the example below, Gluster is taking 6mins~ to copy 128MB / 21,000 files sideways on a client, doing the same thing on NFS (which I know is a totally different solution etc. etc.) takes approximately 10-15 seconds(!).
>> Any advice for tuning the volume or XFS settings would be greatly appreciated.
>> Hopefully I've included enough relevant information below.
>> ## Gluster Client
>> root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/  # du -sh .
>> 127M    .
>> root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/  # find . -type f | wc -l
>> 21791
>> root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/  # du 9584toto9584.txt
>> 4    9584toto9584.txt
>> root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/  # time cp -a private private_perf_test
>> real    5m51.862s
>> user    0m0.862s
>> sys    0m8.334s
>> root at gluster-client:/mnt/gluster_perf_test/ # time rm -rf private_perf_test/
>> real    0m49.702s
>> user    0m0.087s
>> sys    0m0.958s
>> ## Hosts
>> - 16x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz per Gluster host / client
>> - Storage: iSCSI provisioned (via 10Gbit DAC/Fibre), SSD disk, 50K R/RW 4k IOP/s, 400MB/s per Gluster host
>> - Volumes are replicated across two hosts and one arbiter only host
>> - Networking is 10Gbit DAC/Fibre between Gluster hosts and clients
>> - 18GB DDR4 ECC memory
>> ## Volume Info
>> root at gluster-host-01:~ # gluster pool list
>> UUID          Hostname                        State
>> ad02970b-e2aa-4ca8-998c-bd10d5970faa  gluster-host-02.fqdn Connected
>> ea116a94-c19e-48db-b108-0be3ae622e2e  gluster-host-03.fqdn Connected
>> 2e855c25-e7ac-4ff6-be85-e8bcc6f45ee4  localhost                       Connected
>> root at gluster-host-01:~ # gluster volume info uat_storage
>> Volume Name: uat_storage
>> Type: Replicate
>> Volume ID: 7918f1c5-5031-47b8-b054-56f6f0c569a2
>> Status: Started
>> Snapshot Count: 0
>> Number of Bricks: 1 x (2 + 1) = 3
>> Transport-type: tcp
>> Bricks:
>> Brick1: gluster-host-01.fqdn:/mnt/gluster-storage/uat_storage
>> Brick2: gluster-host-02.fqdn:/mnt/gluster-storage/uat_storage
>> Brick3: gluster-host-03.fqdn:/mnt/gluster-storage/uat_storage (arbiter)
>> Options Reconfigured:
>> performance.rda-cache-limit: 256MB
>> network.inode-lru-limit: 50000
>> server.outstanding-rpc-limit: 256
>> performance.client-io-threads: true
>> nfs.disable: on
>> transport.address-family: inet
>> client.event-threads: 8
>> cluster.eager-lock: true
>> cluster.favorite-child-policy: size
>> cluster.lookup-optimize: true
>> cluster.readdir-optimize: true
>> cluster.use-compound-fops: true
>> diagnostics.brick-log-level: ERROR
>> diagnostics.client-log-level: ERROR
>> features.cache-invalidation-timeout: 600
>> features.cache-invalidation: true
>> network.ping-timeout: 15
>> performance.cache-invalidation: true
>> performance.cache-max-file-size: 6MB
>> performance.cache-refresh-timeout: 60
>> performance.cache-size: 1024MB
>> performance.io <http://performance.io/> <http://performance.io <http://performance.io/>>-thread-count: 16
>> performance.md-cache-timeout: 600
>> performance.stat-prefetch: true
>> performance.write-behind-window-size: 256MB
>> server.event-threads: 8
>> transport.listen-backlog: 2048
>> root at gluster-host-01:~ # xfs_info /dev/mapper/gluster-storage-unlocked
>> meta-data=/dev/mapper/gluster-storage-unlocked isize=512    agcount=4, agsize=196607360 blks
>>          =                       sectsz=512   attr=2, projid32bit=1
>>          =                       crc=1        finobt=0 spinodes=0
>> data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=786429440, imaxpct=5
>>          =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
>> naming   =version 2              bsize=8192   ascii-ci=0 ftype=1
>> log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=383998, version=2
>>          =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
>> realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0
>> --
>> Sam McLeod (protoporpoise on IRC)
>> https://smcleod.net
>> https://twitter.com/s_mcleod
>> Words are my own opinions and do not necessarily represent those of my employer or partners.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Tom K.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Living on earth is expensive, but it includes a free trip around the sun.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180319/3e9a4ed1/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list