[Gluster-users] Kernel NFS on GlusterFS
joe at julianfamily.org
Thu Mar 8 18:06:51 UTC 2018
On 03/07/18 14:47, Jim Kinney wrote:
> The gluster-fuse client works but is slower than most people like. I
> use the fuse process in my setup at work. ...
Depending on the use case and configuration. With client-side caching
and cache invalidation, a good number of the performance complaints can
be addressed in a similar (better) way to how nfs makes things fast.
> On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 14:50 -0500, Ben Mason wrote:
>> I'm designing a 2-node, HA NAS that must support NFS. I had planned
>> on using GlusterFS native NFS until I saw that it is being
>> deprecated. Then, I was going to use GlusterFS + NFS-Ganesha until I
>> saw that the Ganesha HA support ended after 3.10 and its replacement
>> is still a WIP. So, I landed on GlusterFS + kernel NFS + corosync &
>> pacemaker, which seems to work quite well. Are there any performance
>> issues or other concerns with using GlusterFS as a replication layer
>> and kernel NFS on top of that?
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
> James P. Kinney III
> Every time you stop a school, you will have to build a jail. What you
> gain at one end you lose at the other. It's like feeding a dog on his
> own tail. It won't fatten the dog.
> - Speech 11/23/1900 Mark Twain
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gluster-users