[Gluster-users] Kernel NFS on GlusterFS

[Joe Julian]

On 03/07/18 14:47, Jim Kinney wrote:
> [snip]. 
> The gluster-fuse client works but is slower than most people like. I 
> use the fuse process in my setup at work. ...

Depending on the use case and configuration. With client-side caching 
and cache invalidation, a good number of the performance complaints can 
be addressed in a similar (better) way to how nfs makes things fast.

>
> On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 14:50 -0500, Ben Mason wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm designing a 2-node, HA NAS that must support NFS. I had planned 
>> on using GlusterFS native NFS until I saw that it is being 
>> deprecated. Then, I was going to use GlusterFS + NFS-Ganesha until I 
>> saw that the Ganesha HA support ended after 3.10 and its replacement 
>> is still a WIP. So, I landed on GlusterFS + kernel NFS + corosync & 
>> pacemaker, which seems to work quite well. Are there any performance 
>> issues or other concerns with using GlusterFS as a replication layer 
>> and kernel NFS on top of that?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> -- 
> James P. Kinney III
>
> Every time you stop a school, you will have to build a jail. What you
> gain at one end you lose at the other. It's like feeding a dog on his
> own tail. It won't fatten the dog.
> - Speech 11/23/1900 Mark Twain
>
> http://heretothereideas.blogspot.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180308/78bc041e/attachment.html>