[Gluster-users] Gluster performance / Dell Idrac enterprise conflict

Ryan Wilkinson ryanwilk at gmail.com
Mon Feb 26 18:46:28 UTC 2018


Here is info. about the Raid controllers.  Doesn't seem to be the culprit.

Slow host:
Name PERC H710 Mini (Embedded)
Firmware Version 21.3.4-0001
Cache Memory Size 512 MB
Fast Host:

Name PERC H310 Mini (Embedded)
Firmware Version 20.12.1-0002
Cache Memory Size 0 MB
Slow host:
Name PERC H310 Mini (Embedded)
Firmware Version 20.13.1-0002
Cache Memory Size 0 MB
Slow host:
Name PERC H310 Mini (Embedded)
Firmware Version 20.13.3-0001 Cache Memory Size 0 MB
Slow Host:
Name PERC H710 Mini (Embedded)
Firmware Version 21.3.5-0002
Cache Memory Size 512 MB
Fast Host
Perc H730
Cache Memory Size 1GB

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Alvin Starr <alvin at netvel.net> wrote:

> I would be really supprised if the problem was related to Idrac.
>
> The Idrac processor is a stand alone cpu with its own nic and runs
> independent of the main CPU.
>
> That being said it does have visibility into the whole system.
>
> try using dmidecode to compare the systems and take a close look at the
> raid controllers and what size and form of cache they have.
>
> On 02/26/2018 11:34 AM, Ryan Wilkinson wrote:
>
> I've tested about 12 different Dell servers.  Ony a couple of them have
> Idrac express and all the others have Idrac Enterprise.  All the boxes with
> Enterprise perform poorly and the couple that have express perform well.  I
> use the disks in raid mode on all of them.  I've tried a few non-Dell boxes
> and they all perform well even though some of them are very old.  I've also
> tried disabling Idrac, the Idrac nic, virtual storage for Idrac with no
> sucess..
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 9:28 AM, Serkan Çoban <cobanserkan at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I don't think it is related with iDRAC itself but some configuration
>> is wrong or there is some hw error.
>> Did you check battery of raid controller? Do you use disks in jbod
>> mode or raid mode?
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Ryan Wilkinson <ryanwilk at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Thanks for the suggestion.  I tried both of these with no difference in
>> > performance.I have tried several other Dell hosts with Idrac Enterprise
>> and
>> > getting the same results.  I also tried a new Dell T130 with Idrac
>> express
>> > and was getting over 700 MB/s.  Any other users had this issues with
>> Idrac
>> > Enterprise??
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:16 AM, Serkan Çoban <cobanserkan at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> "Did you check the BIOS/Power settings? They should be set for high
>> >> performance.
>> >> Also you can try to boot "intel_idle.max_cstate=0" kernel command line
>> >> option to be sure CPUs not entering power saving states.
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Ryan Wilkinson <ryanwilk at gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > I have a 3 host gluster replicated cluster that is providing storage
>> for
>> >> > our
>> >> > RHEV environment.  We've been having issues with inconsistent
>> >> > performance
>> >> > from the VMs depending on which Hypervisor they are running on.  I've
>> >> > confirmed throughput to be ~9Gb/s to each of the storage hosts from
>> the
>> >> > hypervisors.  I'm getting ~300MB/s disk read spead when our test vm
>> is
>> >> > on
>> >> > the slow Hypervisors and over 500 on the faster ones.  The
>> performance
>> >> > doesn't seem to be affected much by the cpu, memory that are in the
>> >> > hypervisors.  I have tried a couple of really old boxes and got over
>> 500
>> >> > MB/s.  The common thread seems to be that the poorly perfoming hosts
>> all
>> >> > have Dell's Idrac 7 Enterprise.  I have one Hypervisor that has
>> Idrac 7
>> >> > express and it performs well.  We've compared system packages and
>> >> > versions
>> >> > til we're blue in the face and have been struggling with this for a
>> >> > couple
>> >> > months but that seems to be the only common denominator.  I've tried
>> on
>> >> > one
>> >> > of those Idrac 7 hosts to disable the nic, virtual drive, etc, etc.
>> but
>> >> > no
>> >> > change in performance.  In addition, I tried 5 new hosts and all are
>> >> > complying to the Idrac enterprise theory.  Anyone else had this
>> issue?!
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Gluster-users mailing list
>> >> > Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> >> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing listGluster-users at gluster.orghttp://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
>
> --
> Alvin Starr                   ||   land:  (905)513-7688 <(905)%20513-7688>
> Netvel Inc.                   ||   Cell:  (416)806-0133 <(416)%20806-0133>alvin at netvel.net              ||
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180226/0eb9e554/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list