[Gluster-users] geo-replication
Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar
khiremat at redhat.com
Wed Feb 7 13:09:20 UTC 2018
We are happy to help you out. Please find the answers inline.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:39 PM, Marcus Pedersén <marcus.pedersen at slu.se>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am planning my new gluster system and tested things out in
> a bunch of virtual machines.
> I need a bit of help to understand how geo-replication behaves.
>
> I have a master gluster cluster replica 2
> (in production I will use an arbiter and replicatied/distributed)
> and the geo cluster is distributed with 2 machines.
> (in production I will have the geo cluster distributed)
>
It's recommended to use slave also to be distribute replicate/aribiter/ec.
Choosing only distribute will cause issues
when of the slave node is down and a file is being synced which belongs to
that node. It would not sync
later.
> Everything is up and running and creating files from client both
> replicates and is distributed in the geo cluster.
>
> The thing I am wondering about is:
> When I run: gluster volume geo-replication status
> I see both slave nodes one is active and the other is passive.
>
> MASTER NODE MASTER VOL MASTER BRICK SLAVE USER SLAVE
> SLAVE NODE STATUS CRAWL STATUS
> LAST_SYNCED
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------------------
> gluster1 interbullfs /interbullfs geouser
> ssh://geouser@gluster-geo1::interbullfs-geo gluster-geo2 Active
> Changelog Crawl 2018-02-06 11:46:08
> gluster2 interbullfs /interbullfs geouser
> ssh://geouser@gluster-geo1::interbullfs-geo gluster-geo1 Passive
> N/A N/A
>
>
> If I shutdown the active slave the status changes to faulty
> and the other one continues to be passive.
>
> MASTER NODE MASTER VOL MASTER BRICK SLAVE USER SLAVE
> SLAVE NODE STATUS CRAWL STATUS
> LAST_SYNCED
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------
> gluster1 interbullfs /interbullfs geouser
> ssh://geouser@gluster-geo1::interbullfs-geo N/A Faulty
> N/A N/A
> gluster2 interbullfs /interbullfs geouser
> ssh://geouser@gluster-geo1::interbullfs-geo gluster-geo1 Passive
> N/A N/A
>
>
> In my understanding I thought that if the active slave stopped
> working the passive slave should become active and should
> continue to replicate from master.
>
> Am I wrong? Is there just one active slave if it is setup as
> a distributed system?
>
The Active/Passive notion is for master node. If gluster1 master node is
down glusterd2 master node will become Active.
It's not for slave node.
>
> What I use:
> Centos 7, gluster 3.12
> I have followed the geo instructions:
> http://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Geo%20Replication/
>
> Many thanks in advance!
>
> Bets regards
> Marcus
>
> --
> **************************************************
> * Marcus Pedersén *
> * System administrator *
> **************************************************
> * Interbull Centre *
> * ================ *
> * Department of Animal Breeding & Genetics — SLU *
> * Box 7023, SE-750 07 *
> * Uppsala, Sweden *
> **************************************************
> * Visiting address: *
> * Room 55614, Ulls väg 26, Ultuna *
> * Uppsala *
> * Sweden *
> * *
> * Tel: +46-(0)18-67 1962 *
> * *
> **************************************************
> * ISO 9001 Bureau Veritas No SE004561-1 *
> **************************************************
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
--
Thanks and Regards,
Kotresh H R
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180207/c4a9f694/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list