[Gluster-users] Dispersed cluster tune, optimize

[Ashish Pandey]

Disperse volumes are not best suited for small read/writes. 
Probably if you can tell us more about your use case, we can come up with some options which could help you. 
- Are you using fuse mount or nfs mount? 
- Are these small writes sequential or random? 

--- 
Ashish 


----- Original Message -----

From: "Marcus Pedersén" <marcus.pedersen at slu.se> 
To: gluster-users at gluster.org 
Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 1:23:15 PM 
Subject: [Gluster-users] Dispersed cluster tune, optimize 

Hi all, 
I have setup a dispersed cluster (2+1), verision 3.12. 
I guessed that we going to get punished by small read/writes... 
and I was right. 
A calculation that usually takes 48 hours 
took about 60 hours and there are many small read/writes 
to intermediate files that at the end get summed up. 

Is there a way to tune, optimize a dispersed cluster to work 
better with small read/writes? 


Many thanks in advance! 

Best resgards 
Marcus Pedersén 

-- 
************************************************** 
* Marcus Pedersén * 
* System administrator * 
************************************************** 
* Interbull Centre * 
* ================ * 
* Department of Animal Breeding & Genetics — SLU * 
* Box 7023, SE-750 07 * 
* Uppsala, Sweden * 
************************************************** 
* Visiting address: * 
* Room 55614, Ulls väg 26, Ultuna * 
* Uppsala * 
* Sweden * 
* * 
* Tel: +46-(0)18-67 1962 * 
* * 
************************************************** 
* ISO 9001 Bureau Veritas No SE004561-1 * 
************************************************** 
_______________________________________________ 
Gluster-users mailing list 
Gluster-users at gluster.org 
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180403/bdafa7bd/attachment.html>