[Gluster-users] ZFS with SSD ZIL vs XFS
gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com
Tue Oct 10 19:58:05 UTC 2017
Last time I've read about tiering in gluster, there wasn't any performance
gain with VM workload and more over doesn't speed up writes...
Il 10 ott 2017 9:27 PM, "Bartosz Zięba" <kontakt at avatat.pl> ha scritto:
> Have you thought about using an SSD as a GlusterFS hot tiers?
> On 10.10.2017 19:59, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
>> 2017-10-10 18:27 GMT+02:00 Jeff Darcy <jeff at pl.atyp.us>:
>>> Probably not. If there is, it would probably favor XFS. The developers
>>> at Red Hat use XFS almost exclusively. We at Facebook have a mix, but
>>> XFS is (I think) the most common. Whatever the developers use tends to
>>> become "the way local filesystems work" and code is written based on
>>> that profile, so even without intention that tends to get a bit of a
>>> boost. To the extent that ZFS makes different tradeoffs - e.g. using
>>> lots more memory, very different disk access patterns - it's probably
>>> going to have a bit more of an "impedance mismatch" with the choices
>>> Gluster itself has made.
>> Ok, so XFS is the way to go :)
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gluster-users