[Gluster-users] Add single server
Shyam
srangana at redhat.com
Mon May 1 18:46:58 UTC 2017
On 05/01/2017 02:42 PM, Joe Julian wrote:
>
>
> On 05/01/2017 11:36 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta
>> <gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com
>> <mailto:gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> 2017-05-01 20:30 GMT+02:00 Shyam <srangana at redhat.com
>> <mailto:srangana at redhat.com>>:
>> > Yes, as a matter of fact, you can do this today using the CLI
>> and creating
>> > nx2 instead of 1x2. 'n' is best decided by you, depending on the
>> growth
>> > potential of your cluster, as at some point 'n' wont be enough
>> if you grow
>> > by some nodes.
>> >
>> > But, when a brick is replaced we will fail to address "(a)
>> ability to retain
>> > replication/availability levels" as we support only homogeneous
>> replication
>> > counts across all DHT subvols. (I could be corrected on this
>> when using
>> > replace-brick though)
>>
>>
>> Yes, but this is error prone.
>>
>>
>> Why?
>>
>
> Because it's done by humans.
Fair point. If Gandalf concurs, we will add this to our "+1 scaling"
feature effort (not yet on github as an issue).
>
>>
>> I'm still thinking that saving (I don't know where, I don't know how)
>> a mapping between
>> files and bricks would solve many issues and add much more
>> flexibility.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pranith
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list