[Gluster-users] [ovirt-users] Very poor GlusterFS performance
Krutika Dhananjay
kdhananj at redhat.com
Wed Jun 21 10:34:05 UTC 2017
No, you don't need to do any of that. Just executing volume-set commands is
sufficient for the changes to take effect.
-Krutika
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Chris Boot <bootc at bootc.net> wrote:
> [replying to lists this time]
>
> On 20/06/17 11:23, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
> > Couple of things:
> >
> > 1. Like Darrell suggested, you should enable stat-prefetch and increase
> > client and server event threads to 4.
> > # gluster volume set <VOL> performance.stat-prefetch on
> > # gluster volume set <VOL> client.event-threads 4
> > # gluster volume set <VOL> server.event-threads 4
> >
> > 2. Also glusterfs-3.10.1 and above has a shard performance bug fix -
> > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16966/
> >
> > With these two changes, we saw great improvement in performance in our
> > internal testing.
>
> Hi Krutika,
>
> Thanks for your input. I have yet to run any benchmarks, but I'll do
> that once I have a bit more time to work on this.
>
> I've tweaked the options as you suggest, but that doesn't seem to have
> made an appreciable difference. I admit that without benchmarks it's a
> bit like sticking your finger in the air, though. Do I need to restart
> my bricks and/or remount the volumes for these to take effect?
>
> I'm actually running GlusterFS 3.10.2-1. This is all coming from the
> CentOS Storage SIG's centos-release-gluster310 repository.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Chris
>
> --
> Chris Boot
> bootc at bootc.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170621/2b4a2b7a/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list