[Gluster-users] Teaming vs Bond?

[David Gossage]

I haven't done any testing of performance differences, but on my oVirt/rhev
i use standard bonding as that's that it supports.  On the stand along
gluster nodes I use teaming for bonding.

Teaming may be slightly easier to manage, but not by much if you are
already used to bond setups.  I haven't noticed any bugs or issues using
teaming.

*David Gossage*
*Carousel Checks Inc. | System Administrator*
*Office* 708.613.2284

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 2:59 PM, wk <wkmail at bneit.com> wrote:

> I'm looking at tuning up a new site and the bonding issue came up
>
> A google search reveals that the gluster docs (and Lindsay) recommend
> balance-alb bonding.
>
> However, "team"ing came up which I wasn't familiar with. Its already in
> RH6/7 and Ubuntu and their Github page implies its stable.
>
> The libteam.org people seem to feel their solution is more lightweight
> and it seems easy enough to setup.
>
> Before I go down this path, I was curious if anyone had any
> experience/comments with 'team'
>
> It would be nice to get a little speed bump essentially for free.
>
> -bill
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170619/d059795e/attachment.html>