[Gluster-users] distribute replicated volume and tons of questions

Gandalf Corvotempesta gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com
Wed Feb 22 21:43:02 UTC 2017

Maybe but the same server was used for years with ext4 up to about 3 month
ago without a single issue

Il 22 feb 2017 10:27 PM, "Ivan Rossi" <rouge2507 at gmail.com> ha scritto:

> Isn't it possible that you had  other problems?
> I find XFS extremely reliable. I have been using XFS only for more thanhsn
> a decade and I had a problem once, and it was due to hardware failures a
> controller...
> Il 22/feb/2017 21:19, "Gandalf Corvotempesta" <
> gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> ha scritto:
>> 2017-02-22 21:16 GMT+01:00 Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org>:
>> > I've been using btrfs for that. In my own tests, btrfs has performed
>> better
>> > for my use cases.
>> I had about 7 XFS crashes in 2 month on my backup server.
>> *every* time i had to run xfs_repair to fix. It took 18hours, the
>> second time. The first failed due to OOM (16GB)
>> I don't think you'll be able to run fsck in parallel on 12 disks at
>> the same time, the server will crash. I also had crashes during an xfs
>> repair.
>> No, i'll never use XFS again.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170222/b5f2281c/attachment.html>

More information about the Gluster-users mailing list