<div dir="auto">Maybe but the same server was used for years with ext4 up to about 3 month ago without a single issue</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">Il 22 feb 2017 10:27 PM, "Ivan Rossi" <<a href="mailto:rouge2507@gmail.com">rouge2507@gmail.com</a>> ha scritto:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto">Isn't it possible that you had other problems?<div dir="auto">I find XFS extremely reliable. I have been using XFS only for more thanhsn a decade and I had a problem once, and it was due to hardware failures a controller...</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">Il 22/feb/2017 21:19, "Gandalf Corvotempesta" <<a href="mailto:gandalf.corvotempesta@gmail.com" target="_blank">gandalf.corvotempesta@gmail.<wbr>com</a>> ha scritto:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">2017-02-22 21:16 GMT+01:00 Joe Julian <<a href="mailto:joe@julianfamily.org" target="_blank">joe@julianfamily.org</a>>:<br>
> I've been using btrfs for that. In my own tests, btrfs has performed better<br>
> for my use cases.<br>
<br>
I had about 7 XFS crashes in 2 month on my backup server.<br>
*every* time i had to run xfs_repair to fix. It took 18hours, the<br>
second time. The first failed due to OOM (16GB)<br>
I don't think you'll be able to run fsck in parallel on 12 disks at<br>
the same time, the server will crash. I also had crashes during an xfs<br>
repair.<br>
<br>
No, i'll never use XFS again.<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Gluster-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org" target="_blank">Gluster-users@gluster.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.gluster.org/mailm<wbr>an/listinfo/gluster-users</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>
</blockquote></div></div>