[Gluster-users] Quick performance check?

Momonth momonth at gmail.com
Fri Feb 3 14:09:27 UTC 2017


I ran some benchmarking on SSD enabled servers, 10Gb connected, see
the file attached.

I'm still looking at GlusterFS as a persistent storage for containers,
and it's clear it's not going to compete with local file system


On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Alex Sudakar <alex.sudakar at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi.  I'm looking for a clustered filesystem for a very simple
> scenario.  I've set up Gluster but my tests have shown quite a
> performance penalty when compared to using a local XFS filesystem.
> This no doubt reflects the reality of moving to a proper distributed
> filesystem, but I'd like to quickly check that I haven't missed
> something obvious that might improve performance.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GlusterFS-benchmarking.png
Type: image/png
Size: 36033 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170203/7ca084d0/attachment.png>

More information about the Gluster-users mailing list