[Gluster-users] Gluster update

[David Gossage]

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <
gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote:

> Il 26/05/2016 20:40, Dj Merrill ha scritto:
>
>> I believe that is one of the design criteria, for minor revs. For major
>> revs, personally I would want to take things offline and not want to do it
>> "hot", but one of the people more experienced than I will have to chime in
>> here. -Dj
>>
>
> That's true, but in huge environment, taking all down is simply impossible.
> I'm not talking about taking down 1 server per time, but taking everything
> down
> at the same time as wrote (if I understood properly) on docs.
>

If I have those sort of uptime requirements  what I typically do is have 2
clusters of vm's and storage so I can have primary/secondary on different
clusters so they can be brought down and have the other up.  Otherwise
regardless of updates or not I run the risk of one failure bringing
everything down.

_______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160526/3c33e27f/attachment.html>