[Gluster-users] Peer probe succeeded, but "not in 'Peer in Cluster' state"

Russell Purinton russell.purinton at gmail.com
Wed Mar 23 03:47:05 UTC 2016


The routing table looks normal.   That 3rd statement that Pawan mentioned is just a normal default gateway.   Nothing wrong there.

I suspect the issue is at the virtual network layer…  <forward mode='route’/>  seems suspect.  

http://serverfault.com/questions/270931/routing-networking-on-kvm <http://serverfault.com/questions/270931/routing-networking-on-kvm>

I think you’d want to setup Bridge mode interfaces.

Russ
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 11:39 PM, Pawan Devaiah <pawan.devaiah at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The third statement in your route table states that for any network the default gateway is 192.168.122.1
> 
> I would suggest either you remove that statement or increase the metrics from 0, you already have a route to 192.168.122.0, it is in same broadcast domain so you don't have to go through the gateway.
> 
> Cheers
> Dev
> 
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Joshua J. Kugler <joshua at azariah.com <mailto:joshua at azariah.com>> wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 22:12:00 Russell Purinton wrote:
> > If the subnet mask is wrong on 122.11 it may forward all traffic to the
> > default gateway.  The default gateway may be configured to NAT traffic from
> > the LAN, so the response packet would be seen by .10 as coming from .1.
> 
> So, it turns out the subnet isn't wrong, but for some reason, it's still
> routing through the gateway, and appears to be coming from .1, instead of .11.
> I'm not sure why.  This is a libvirt network, configured thus:
> 
> <network>
>   <name>default</name>
>   <uuid>f137a5c4-1dd2-453a-a6e6-c161f2918d41</uuid>
>   <forward mode='route'/>
>   <bridge name='virbr0' stp='on' delay='0'/>
>   <mac address='52:54:00:42:87:a9'/>
>   <ip address='192.168.122.1' netmask='255.255.255.0'>
>     <dhcp>
>       <range start='192.168.122.2' end='192.168.122.254'/>
>     </dhcp>
>   </ip>
> </network>
> 
> When this was working, I was using forward mode=nat, but then two different
> libvirt networks couldn't talk to each other.  The two machines are on the
> same segment, on the same virtual switch. I'm not sure why they are getting
> routing through the gateway.  Off to do more troubleshooting! :)
> 
> j
> 
> --
> Joshua J. Kugler - Fairbanks, Alaska
> Azariah Enterprises - Programming and Website Design
> joshua at azariah.com <mailto:joshua at azariah.com> - Jabber: pedahzur at gmail.com <mailto:pedahzur at gmail.com>
> PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ <http://pgp.mit.edu/>  ID 0x73B13B6A
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users <http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160322/6c693627/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list