[Gluster-users] Help needed in debugging a glusted-vol.log file..

[Atin Mukherjee]

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:06 AM, B.K.Raghuram <bkrram at gmail.com> wrote:

> A request for a quick clarification Atin.. The bind-insecure and
> allow-insecure seem to be turned on by default from 3.7.3 so if I install
> 3.7.13, then can I safely use samba/gfapi-vfs without modifying any
> parameters?
>

That's right!


>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> This doesn't look like abnormal given you are running gluster 3.6.1
>> version. In 3.6 "allow-insecure" option is turned off by default which
>> means glusterd will only entertain requests received on privileged ports
>> and this node has exhausted all the privileged ports by that time. If you
>> are willing to turn on bind-insecure option, then I do see this problem
>> going away.
>>
>> P.S : This option is been turned on by default in 3.7.
>>
>> ~Atin
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Will have a look at the logs tomorrow.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sunday 24 July 2016, B.K.Raghuram <bkrram at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Some issues seem to have cropped up at a remote location and I'm trying
>>>> to make sense of what the issues are. Could someone help in throwing some
>>>> light on the potential issues here? I notice that something happened at
>>>> 2016-07-20 06:33:09.621556 after which a host of issues are being reported
>>>> (around line 29655).  After that there seem to be a host of communication
>>>> issues.
>>>>
>>>> Also does the line "0-rpc-service: Request received from non-privileged
>>>> port. Failing request" mean that potentially the samba access through the
>>>> gfapi vfs module was failed?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> --Atin
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> --Atin
>>
>
>


-- 

--Atin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160727/8bcc6fbb/attachment.html>