[Gluster-users] glusterFS performance
jayakrishnan mm
jayakrishnan.mm at gmail.com
Thu Feb 4 06:37:23 UTC 2016
Hi
Any one pls. answer these querry
On Feb 1, 2016 2:43 PM, "jayakrishnan mm" <jayakrishnan.mm at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two server nodes, gluster1 & gluster2 ,running on Ubuntu 14.04,
> and is using gluster ver 3.7.6 . I am using fio tools ver 2.6 for
> testing performance.(IO engine= libaio)
>
>
>
>
> gluster1 server node is a high performance CPU (8 core , i7/3.4GHz)
> with SSD (random rw performance without glusterFS is ~14MB/s with ext4
> FS, 150 GB ), while
>
> gluster2 is a Pentium g840 CPU (2 core, 2.8GHz) with a WD HDD of 1 TB
> size.(random rw performance without glusterFS is ~500KB/s only with ext4).
>
>
> 1. I see gluster1 seq read performance is much higher than gluster 2.
> See below data(in KB/s).Is this because gluster1 CPU is better and it
> is using SSD ?(replica 2)
>
>
>
> Seq. read Seq. write
> gluster1 319882 83253
> gluster2 135931 61059
>
>
>
>
> 2. I also see gluster2 performs well when configured as distributed
> volumes, compared to gluster1. Why is it so ? Pls see the below
> data.(in KB/s)
>
>
> random read random write
> gluster1 1029 1027
> gluster2 3358 3353
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Expecting experts' answer.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> JK
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160204/ae6d43ae/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list