[Gluster-users] What is the corresponding op-version for a glusterfs release?

[Atin Mukherjee]

-Atin
Sent from one plus one
On 20-Apr-2016 9:22 pm, "Dj Merrill" <gluster at deej.net> wrote:
>
> On 04/19/2016 05:42 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> >> After a brief search, I discovered the following solution for RHGS:
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2050753 It suggests updating the
op-version of the cluster after the upgrade. There isn't any evidence of
this procedure in the community documentation (except for in this mailing
list).
> >> >
> >> > Unfortunately, nor 30709 or 30708 are valid op-version so I moved to
30707:
> > Although the op-version numbering is aligned with the release versions
> > but that doesn't go as a strict rule. If any new volume tunable option
> > is introduced between the release then the op-version is bumped up.
> > Between 3.7.7 and 3.7.9 releases there were no new options introduced
> > and hence the op-version goes as 30707 for 3.7.9 release.
>
>
> Curious, is there any reason why this isn't automatically updated when
> managing the updates with "yum update"?
This is still manual as we want to give users choose whether they want to
use a new feature or not. If they want, then a manual bump up is required.
>
> Just checked my system and it was set to "operating-version=2" even
> though I have been on 3.7.x for awhile and just updated to 3.7.11.
>
> I just ran "gluster volume set all cluster.op-version 30710" successfully.
>
> What have I been missing all these years?  :-)
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Dj
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160420/f18fac77/attachment.html>