[Gluster-users] Gluster on ZFS with Compression

[Lindsay Mathieson]

On 1 October 2015 at 01:38, Tom Pepper <tom at encoding.com> wrote:

> If you can stomach a small recovery window, I'd instead suggest vanilla
> NFS, snapshots, and zfs send/receive to keep a nearline replica.  You'll
> have much higher sequential I/O if so.
>


You mean not use glusters/ceph at all? a pure zfs solution? I have
considered a setup like that, it has its advantages and we could wear the
recovery window. But it does require manual maintenance and switch over
when a node goes down as opposed to the automation of gluster. But the
performance is very good.


>
> LACP will also restrict single socket performance to 1Gbps, but multi
> socket can exceed of course.
>

Its a PITA that when dealing with two/three nodes setups :(


thanks.





-- 
Lindsay
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20151001/f5bf7ced/attachment.html>