[Gluster-users] Unable to start glusterfs-server after upgrade to 3.7.6

[Kaamesh Kamalaaharan]

thanks pierre. Im trying to downgrade back to 3.6 as suggested by you and
joe earlier but im having some problems.
I



On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:51 AM, Pierre MGP Pro <
pierre-mgp-jouy.inra at agsic.net> wrote:

> Hi Kaamesh,
>
> Le 29/11/2015 17:57, Kaamesh Kamalaaharan a écrit :
>
> Hi everyone,
> I am using gluster for the past year with no problem. Decided to upgrade
> to v3.7.6 and i couldnt start gluster ever since. this is the error im
> getting
>
>
> I manage two glusterfs :
>
>    - one with 14 nodes and two volumes around 500To ;
>    - the other with four nodes with also two volumes  with  To ;
>
> I work with the 3.6.6 released.  Why ?
>
> I have tested one day the 7.x release and encounter many problems as you.
> That doesn't means that the 3.7.x track is bad,  that means the theses
> releases are  a test releases ans need more attention, that the stable
> releases.
>
>
> My opinion,  is that I will work always with the 3.6.6 release, still the
> 3.8.x which is announced as a more reliable release.
> And the I will build numerous VM with that release to work on the
> configuration differences before put them in production.
>
> I think that it's the more fluently approach of a such complex system.
>
> Sincerely
>
> Pierre Léonard
>
>

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:51 AM, Pierre MGP Pro <
pierre-mgp-jouy.inra at agsic.net> wrote:

> Hi Kaamesh,
>
> Le 29/11/2015 17:57, Kaamesh Kamalaaharan a écrit :
>
> Hi everyone,
> I am using gluster for the past year with no problem. Decided to upgrade
> to v3.7.6 and i couldnt start gluster ever since. this is the error im
> getting
>
>
> I manage two glusterfs :
>
>    - one with 14 nodes and two volumes around 500To ;
>    - the other with four nodes with also two volumes  with  To ;
>
> I work with the 3.6.6 released.  Why ?
>
> I have tested one day the 7.x release and encounter many problems as you.
> That doesn't means that the 3.7.x track is bad,  that means the theses
> releases are  a test releases ans need more attention, that the stable
> releases.
>
>
> My opinion,  is that I will work always with the 3.6.6 release, still the
> 3.8.x which is announced as a more reliable release.
> And the I will build numerous VM with that release to work on the
> configuration differences before put them in production.
>
> I think that it's the more fluently approach of a such complex system.
>
> Sincerely
>
> Pierre Léonard
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20151130/a67ea6d9/attachment.html>