[Gluster-users] Upgrade to 3.7.0 with transaction lock issues

Sergio Traldi sergio.traldi at pd.infn.it
Wed Jun 10 08:11:32 UTC 2015


Derek Yarnell <derek at ...> writes:

> 
> We just upgraded to 3.7.0 from 3.4.2 last night (no quotas, no geosync)
> and the volume came up and is available via NFS.  But we can't get
> status for the volume or any other administration.  We have restarted
> all the gluster daemons on both nodes in the cluster multiple times.
> 
> gluster> volume status
> Another transaction is in progress. Please try again after sometime.
> 
> [2015-05-22 13:46:49.309316] E [glusterd-utils.c:164:glusterd_lock]
> 0-management: Unable to get lock for uuid:
> b01d12b9-e2a1-400a-a3ad-1018dead6e65, lock held by:
> b01d12b9-e2a1-400a-a3ad-1018dead6e65
> [2015-05-22 13:46:49.309382] E
> [glusterd-syncop.c:1736:gd_sync_task_begin] 0-management: Unable to
> acquire lock
> 


Hi all,
I two servers with 3.7.1 and have the same problem with 3.7.1:
# rpm -qa | grep gluster | sort
glusterfs-3.7.1-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-api-3.7.1-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-cli-3.7.1-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-client-xlators-3.7.1-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-fuse-3.7.1-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-geo-replication-3.7.1-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-libs-3.7.1-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-server-3.7.1-1.el6.x86_64

# gluster volume status
Another transaction is in progress. Please try again after sometime.

and in the log I found:
[2015-06-09 16:12:38.949842] E [glusterd-utils.c:164:glusterd_lock]
0-management: Unable to get lock for uuid:
99a41a2a-2ce5-461c-aec0-510bd5b37bf2, lock held by:
04a7d2bb-bdd9-4e0d-b460-87ad4adbe12c
[2015-06-09 16:12:38.949864] E [glusterd-syncop.c:1766:gd_sync_task_begin]
0-management: Unable to acquire lock

I check the file:
>From server 1:
# cat /var/lib/glusterd/peers/04a7d2bb-bdd9-4e0d-b460-87ad4adbe12c 
uuid=04a7d2bb-bdd9-4e0d-b460-87ad4adbe12c
state=3
hostname1=192.168.61.101

>From server 2:
# cat /var/lib/glusterd/peers/99a41a2a-2ce5-461c-aec0-510bd5b37bf2 
uuid=99a41a2a-2ce5-461c-aec0-510bd5b37bf2
state=3
hostname1=192.168.61.100

And they seems correct.

Any hint?

Cheers
Sergio



More information about the Gluster-users mailing list