[Gluster-users] One volume gluster vol
Jordan Willis
jwillis0720 at gmail.com
Sat Aug 15 10:02:37 UTC 2015
If you are creating a volume that your brick is already mounted on, I’m not even sure you have to give it a hostname.
> gluster volume create myVol1 /gfs/mybox/brick1
or
> gluster volume create myVol1 localhost:/gfs/mybox/brick1
> On Aug 15, 2015, at 2:37 AM, Mark s2c <mark at stuff2cloud.com> wrote:
>
> [root at mybox ~]# df -h
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/mapper/centos-root 50G 1.3G 49G 3% /
> devtmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /dev
> tmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /dev/shm
> tmpfs 7.8G 8.7M 7.8G 1% /run
> tmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
> /dev/sda1 497M 164M 334M 33% /boot
> /dev/mapper/centos-home 166G 33M 166G 1% /home
> /dev/mapper/brick1 17T 34M 17T 1% /gfs/mybox/brick1
> [root at mybox ~]# !531
> gluster volume create myVol1 mybox:/gfs/mybox/brick1
> volume create: myVol1: failed: Host mybox is not in 'Peer in Cluster’ state
>
> Can you give me the command cos I can only find one instance of it on the net and it’s this one.
>
> Much obliged.
>
> From: Atin Mukherjee <atin.mukherjee83 at gmail.com <mailto:atin.mukherjee83 at gmail.com>>
> Date: Friday, 14 August 2015 15:17
> To: Mark Lewis <mark at stuff2cloud.com <mailto:mark at stuff2cloud.com>>
> Cc: "Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>" <Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>>
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] One volume gluster vol
>
>> Can you please detail the exact issue. I don't see any issue in setting a single node cluster apart from sacrificing high availability.
>> -Atin
>> Sent from one plus one
>> On Aug 14, 2015 1:06 PM, "Mark s2c" <mark at stuff2cloud.com <mailto:mark at stuff2cloud.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello can I create a one volume gfs vol?
>>> As I have no peer, I appear to only have local host and even if I reference it with its host name as the error says, it doesn't work. Is it even possible or do I need a second server?
>>>
>>> We've just bought a big box so a second would be a big outlay. Could I use a VM with disproportionate bricks just to get the peerage set up and then remove one of the members?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users <http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20150815/9a55fe9f/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list