[Gluster-users] License option for the GlusterFS

[Zhou Ganhong]

Thanks a lot.

2014-10-16 21:08 GMT+08:00 Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com>:

> On 10/15/2014 09:00 PM, Zhou Ganhong wrote:
>
>> Hi, all
>>
>> I am confused by the License used by the GlusterFS. There are different
>> descriptions in the web site. Which one is correct? Thanks a lot.
>>
>
> The community web site is maintained by volunteers. It is often out of
> date.
>
> The one in the source is the only one you need to consider. It is the dual
> license GPLv2 or LGPLv3+. _Everything_ in GlusterFS is covered by the dual
> license.
>
> --
>
> Kaleb
>
>
>
>
>> Here is the link that claims that AGPL is appled.
>>
>> http://www.gluster.org/documentation/community/GNU_
>> Affero_General_Public_License/
>>
>> But In these links,
>> http://gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Developers and
>> https://forge.gluster.org/glusterfs-core/pages/Home, the below is
>> mentioned. It seems that the client library is Dual License.
>>
>> License Change
>> <http://www.gluster.org/2012/05/glusterfs-license-change/> - we recently
>> changed the client library code to a dual license under the GPL v2 and
>> the LGPL v3 or later
>>
>> // Gulf
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20141017/e0978d4f/attachment.html>