[Gluster-users] Self-heal failed on new bricks. Or did it?

John Gardeniers jgardeniers at objectmastery.com
Wed Mar 12 04:46:30 UTC 2014


Hi All,

I'm new to Gluster and am therefore at the "suck it and see" stage,
trying different things to see it in operation. I have a replica pair
with a single volume of one brick on each server acting as a back end
for an RHEV test install.

Today I added an additional brick on each of the replica pair with
"gluster volume add-brick testvol 192.168.19.20:/brick2
192.168.19.21:/brick2 force", the force being necessary as brick2 is on
the system drive (remember, I'm just experimenting for now).

While there are no other signs of errors, when I run "gluster volume
heal testvol info heal-failed" I get the following:

Gathering Heal info on volume testvol has been successful

Brick 192.168.19.20:/storage
Number of entries: 0

Brick 192.168.19.21:/storage
Number of entries: 0

Brick 192.168.19.20:/brick2
Number of entries: 4
at                    path on brick
-----------------------------------
2014-03-12 03:59:50 /f67693a9-e255-4466-a5a9-298e54f0f7c7/dom_md
2014-03-12 03:59:50 /f67693a9-e255-4466-a5a9-298e54f0f7c7/master/tasks
2014-03-12 03:59:50 /f67693a9-e255-4466-a5a9-298e54f0f7c7/master/vms
2014-03-12 03:59:50 /f67693a9-e255-4466-a5a9-298e54f0f7c7/master

Brick 192.168.19.21:/brick2
Number of entries: 0

I've rsynced brick2 from each gluster server to another box and diffed
them. There are absolutely no differences. So how come Gluster is saying
that the heal failed? More importantly, what can I do about it?

Thanks,
John




More information about the Gluster-users mailing list