[Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.4.4 - memory leak in fuse_getxattr

[Viktor Villafuerte]

Thanks Ravishankar, I've patched and built the package already for RHEL6
and now RHEL5.

Also while I was doing this I've noticed that bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073217 has not been
included in 3.4.4 either. I've manually patched my pkg here.

Just letting you guys know

v


On Mon 30 Jun 2014 09:54:21, Ravishankar N wrote:
> On 06/30/2014 07:35 AM, Viktor Villafuerte wrote:
> >On the same note, I've just got .src RPM for 3.4.4 and the patch is not
> >there. From the email trail it seems that it's not officially backported
> >to 3.4.4. It is present in the latest GIT release though..
> Yup, like Justin said in a later thread, the patch has been merged in 3.4
> branch and is available 3.4.5 beta1 onwards. Backports happen to a 'branch'
> and is available in the subsequent 'release' made off that branch.
> >Just to make sure I'm doing the right thing the code change (patch :) is
> >only about those 12 lines in 'fuse_getxattr', right?
> You can apply http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8164/  manually to the 3.4.4
> source; that should be fine.
> >I'm going to manually add it and rebuilt 3.4.4 here at work so I just
> >want to make sure I won't miss half the patch or smth... :)
> >
> >v
> >
> >
> >
> >On Tue 24 Jun 2014 18:40:25, Peter Auyeung wrote:
> >>Would that be in 3.4.5 or we can apply a patch on 3.4.4?
> >>
> >>I am planning to deploy a prod on 3.4.4.
> >>
> >>Thanks
> >>Peter
> >>________________________________________
> >>From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] on behalf of Martin Svec [martin.svec at zoner.cz]
> >>Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:50 AM
> >>To: Justin Clift
> >>Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org
> >>Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.4.4 - memory leak in fuse_getxattr
> >>
> >>Dne 24.6.2014 18:53, Justin Clift napsal(a):
> >>>On 24/06/2014, at 5:35 PM, Martin Svec wrote:
> >>><snip>
> >>>>Note that the patch is 11 months old. Why it isn't merged in 3.4 branch yet?
> >>>
> >>>Sounds like we just need to backport it to release-3.4 branch then.
> >>Thank you, that would be fine :) It's surprising that nobody reported
> >>it in 3.4 yet. I was able to crash my 1GB testlab VM in a few minutes
> >>(150,000 small files copied to Gluster required more than 800MB of
> >>glusterfs process heap).
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>
> >>Martin Svec
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Gluster-users mailing list
> >>Gluster-users at gluster.org
> >>http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Gluster-users mailing list
> >>Gluster-users at gluster.org
> >>http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

-- 
Regards

Viktor Villafuerte
Optus Internet Engineering
t: 02 808-25265