[Gluster-users] Horrendously slow directory access

Joe Julian joe at julianfamily.org
Wed Apr 9 14:36:08 UTC 2014


What's the backend filesystem?
Were there any brick errors,  probably around  2014-03-31 22:44:04 (half an hour before the frame timeout)? 


On April 9, 2014 7:10:58 AM PDT, James Cuff <james_cuff at harvard.edu> wrote:
>Hi team,
>
>I hate "me too" emails sometimes not at all constructive, but I feel I
>really ought chip in from real world systems we use in anger and at
>massive scale here.
>
>So we also use NFS to "mask" this and other performance issues.  The
>cluster.readdir-optimize gave us similar results unfortunately.
>
>We reported our other challenge back last summer but we stalled on
>this:
>
>http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2013-June/036252.html
>
>We also unfortunately now see a new NFS phenotype that I've pasted
>below which is again is causing real heartburn.
>
>Small files, always difficult for any FS, might be worth doing some
>regression testing with small file directory scenarios in test - it's
>an easy reproducer on even moderately sized gluster clusters.  Hope
>some good progress can be made, and I understand it's a tough one to
>track down performance hangs and issues.  I just wanted to say that we
>really do see them, and have tried many things to avoid them.
>
>Here's the note from my team:
>
>We were hitting 30 minute timeouts on getxattr/system.posix_acl_access
>calls on directories in a NFS v3 mount (w/ acl option) of a 10-node
>40-brick gluster 3.4.0 volume.  Strace shows where the client hangs:
>
>$ strace -tt -T getfacl d6h_take1
>...
>18:43:57.929225 lstat("d6h_take1", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755,
>st_size=7024, ...}) = 0 <0.257107>
>18:43:58.186461 getxattr("d6h_take1", "system.posix_acl_access",
>0x7fffdf2b9f50, 132) = -1 ENODATA (No data available) <1806.296893>
>19:14:04.483556 stat("d6h_take1", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=7024,
>...}) = 0 <0.642362>
>19:14:05.126025 getxattr("d6h_take1", "system.posix_acl_default",
>0x7fffdf2b9f50, 132) = -1 ENODATA (No data available) <0.000024>
>19:14:05.126114 stat("d6h_take1", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=7024,
>...}) = 0 <0.000010>
>...
>
>Load on the servers was moderate.  While the above was hanging,
>getfacl worked nearly instantaneously on that directory on all bricks.
> When it finally hit the 30 minute timeout, gluster logged it in
>nfs.log:
>
>[2014-03-31 23:14:04.481154] E [rpc-clnt.c:207:call_bail]
>0-holyscratch-client-36: bailing out frame type(GlusterFS 3.3)
>op(GETXATTR(18)) xid = 0x8168809x sent = 2014-03-31 22:43:58.442411.
>timeout = 1800
>[2014-03-31 23:14:04.481233] W
>[client-rpc-fops.c:1112:client3_3_getxattr_cbk]
>0-holyscratch-client-36: remote operation failed: Transport endpoint
>is not connected. Path: <gfid:b116fb01-b13d-448a-90d0-a8693a98698b>
>(b116fb01-b13d-448a-90d0-a8693a98698b). Key: (null)
>
>Other than that, we didn't see anything directly related in the nfs or
>brick logs or anything out of sorts with the gluster services.  A
>couple other errors raise eyebrows, but these are different
>directories (neighbors of the example above) and at different times:
>
>holyscratch07: /var/log/glusterfs/nfs.log:[2014-03-31 19:30:47.794454]
>I [dht-layout.c:630:dht_layout_normalize] 0-holyscratch-dht: found
>anomalies in /ramanathan_lab/dhuh/d9_take2_BGI/Diffreg. holes=1
>overlaps=0
>holyscratch07: /var/log/glusterfs/nfs.log:[2014-03-31 19:31:47.794447]
>I [dht-layout.c:630:dht_layout_normalize] 0-holyscratch-dht: found
>anomalies in /ramanathan_lab/dhuh/d9_take2_BGI/Diffreg. holes=1
>overlaps=0
>holyscratch07: /var/log/glusterfs/nfs.log:[2014-03-31 19:33:47.802135]
>I [dht-layout.c:630:dht_layout_normalize] 0-holyscratch-dht: found
>anomalies in /ramanathan_lab/dhuh/d9_take2_BGI/Diffreg. holes=1
>overlaps=0
>holyscratch07: /var/log/glusterfs/nfs.log:[2014-03-31 19:34:47.802182]
>I [dht-layout.c:630:dht_layout_normalize] 0-holyscratch-dht: found
>anomalies in /ramanathan_lab/dhuh/d9_take2_BGI/Diffreg. holes=1
>overlaps=0
>holyscratch07: /var/log/glusterfs/nfs.log:[2014-03-31 19:36:47.764329]
>I [dht-layout.c:630:dht_layout_normalize] 0-holyscratch-dht: found
>anomalies in /ramanathan_lab/dhuh/d9_take2_BGI/Diffreg. holes=1
>overlaps=0
>holyscratch07: /var/log/glusterfs/nfs.log:[2014-03-31 19:37:47.773164]
>I [dht-layout.c:630:dht_layout_normalize] 0-holyscratch-dht: found
>anomalies in /ramanathan_lab/dhuh/d9_take2_BGI/Diffreg. holes=1
>overlaps=0
>holyscratch07: /var/log/glusterfs/nfs.log:[2014-03-31 19:39:47.774285]
>I [dht-layout.c:630:dht_layout_normalize] 0-holyscratch-dht: found
>anomalies in /ramanathan_lab/dhuh/d9_take2_BGI/Diffreg. holes=1
>overlaps=0
>holyscratch07: /var/log/glusterfs/nfs.log:[2014-03-31 19:40:47.780338]
>I [dht-layout.c:630:dht_layout_normalize] 0-holyscratch-dht: found
>anomalies in /ramanathan_lab/dhuh/d9_take2_BGI/Diffreg. holes=1
>overlaps=0
>holyscratch07: /var/log/glusterfs/nfs.log:[2014-03-31 19:42:47.730345]
>I [dht-layout.c:630:dht_layout_normalize] 0-holyscratch-dht: found
>anomalies in /ramanathan_lab/dhuh/d9_take2_BGI/Diffreg. holes=1
>overlaps=0
>
>holyscratch08:
>/var/log/glusterfs/bricks/holyscratch08_03-brick.log:[2014-03-31
>00:57:51.973565] E [posix-helpers.c:696:posix_handle_pair]
>0-holyscratch-posix:
>/holyscratch08_03/brick/ramanathan_lab/dhuh/d9_take2_BGI/cuffdiffRN.txt:
>key:system.posix_acl_access error:Invalid argument
>holyscratch08:
>/var/log/glusterfs/bricks/holyscratch08_03-brick.log:[2014-03-31
>01:18:12.345818] E [posix-helpers.c:696:posix_handle_pair]
>0-holyscratch-posix:
>/holyscratch08_03/brick/ramanathan_lab/dhuh/d9_take2_BGI/cuffdiffRN.txt:
>key:system.posix_acl_access error:Invalid argument
>holyscratch05:
>/var/log/glusterfs/bricks/holyscratch05_04-brick.log:[2014-03-31
>21:16:37.057674] E [posix-helpers.c:696:posix_handle_pair]
>0-holyscratch-posix:
>/holyscratch05_04/brick/ramanathan_lab/dhuh/d9_take2_BGI/Diffreg/cuffdiffRN.txt:
>key:system.posix_acl_access error:Invalid argument
>
>--
>dr. james cuff, assistant dean for research computing, harvard
>university | division of science | thirty eight oxford street,
>cambridge. ma. 02138 | +1 617 384 7647 | http://rc.fas.harvard.edu
>
>
>On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:52 AM,  <james.bellinger at icecube.wisc.edu>
>wrote:
>> I am seeing something perhaps similar.  3.4.2-1, 2 servers, each with
>1
>> brick, replicated.  A du of a local (ZFS) directory tree of 297834
>files
>> and 525GB takes about 17 minutes.  A du of the gluster copy is still
>not
>> finished after 22 hours.  Network activity has been about 5-6KB/sec
>until
>> (I gather) du hit a directory with 22450 files, when activity jumped
>to
>> 300KB/sec (200 packets/sec) for about 15-20 minutes.  If I assume
>that the
>> spike came from scanning the two largest directories, that looks like
>> about 8K of traffic per file, and about 5 packets.
>>
>> A 3.3.2 gluster installation that we are trying to retire is not
>afflicted
>> this way.
>>
>> James Bellinger
>>
>>>
>>> Am I the only person using Gluster suffering from very slow
>directory
>>> access? It's so seriously bad that it almost makes Gluster unusable.
>>>
>>> Using NFS instead of the Fuse client masks the problem as long as
>the
>>> directories are cached but it's still hellishly slow when you first
>>> access them.
>>>
>>> Has there been any progress at all fixing this bug?
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067256
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>_______________________________________________
>Gluster-users mailing list
>Gluster-users at gluster.org
>http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20140409/e06072a3/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list