[Gluster-users] metadata for stat : Should it be identical?

Anand Avati avati at gluster.org
Fri Oct 25 00:12:56 UTC 2013


Gluster does have logic to always show mtime which is the highest in value.
It is probably a bug if you are witnessing different mtimes at different
times when no writes have happened in between.

Avati



On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:31 PM, James <purpleidea at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 13:00 -0700, Robert Hajime Lanning wrote:
> >
> > Design philosophy...
> >
> > There is no metadata server.  When you look at timestamps in stat,
> > you
> > are seeing the real stat of the file.
> So this raises an interesting point...
>
> >
> > If you have "replica 2" then you have two files.  The stat can come
> > from
> > either one.  Mtime will be the modification time of the file
> If the replica N files all have slightly different mtimes (it seems they
> usually will because they weren't written at exactly the same time),
> then isn't this a point of inconsistency for a script running on a fuse
> mount which expects the same mtime on a file?
>
> Shouldn't gluster somehow coordinate to set all the files mtimes to be
> consistent to say the last mtime in the replica set?
>
>
> >  referenced
> > by the time on the server (not the client.)
> >
> > One of the strengths of GlusterFS is that it does not have the
> > bottleneck/single point of failure of a single metadata server.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20131024/dd949558/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list