[Gluster-users] glusterfs missing files on ls
poccecai at gmail.com
Thu May 30 09:19:51 UTC 2013
sorry if I suggested trivial checks, but in system administration sometimes
people make a little configuration typo and everything ends up in a big
Anyway, I'm not a glusterfs guru, so I'm not sure that I can help you much
more with your problem.
What I would suggest, though, is to have a look at the few diagnostic tools
that glusterfs provides.
In the same Admin guide that I mentioned earlier, chapter 7.8 discuss about
self-healing, that the version of gluster you have should perform
automatically. However, the manual chapter also suggests some commands to
asses the status of the volumes and you might be able to extract useful
information about what went wrong in your volume, like for example:
gluster volume heal *VOLNAME* info
which should provide info about the files that need healing across the
There are also some other options that let you get info about the volume
status, so that's probably a good place to start from...
On 30 May 2013 09:33, Stefano Sinigardi <stefano.sinigardi at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Davide,
> I have 6 bricks per node, across two nodes, in the replicated volume
> and those should be correctly coupled as you were saying.
> I never access bricks directly, but always through their FUSE mount point.
> Maybe I was not clear enough, but the problem is that if I access
> folders through the fuse mount point I don't find all the files that
> should be there and that in fact I find if I browse manually each
> brick. Now I've launched a
> find <gluster-mount> -noleaf -print0 | xargs --null stat >/dev/null 2>
> to see if it works better than the find . > /dev/null that was not
> working, but it's eating almost all of the 16 GB of RAM of the machine
> as of now and I fear that it will start swapping...
> Any suggestion?
> Thanks a lot
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Davide Poccecai <poccecai at gmail.com>
> > Hi Stefano,
> > I'm not sure what is causing your problem, and the variables in your
> > configuration can lead to various scenarios.
> > In any case, according to what you wrote, I will assume that the
> > replicated-distributed volume is contained on 2 machines only, spanning 4
> > bricks.
> > You might have done this already, but if you look at page 15 of the
> > Administration guide (I have the guide for 3.3.0, but I think it's the
> > same), you will read in the "Note" that you need to be careful about the
> > order in which you specify the bricks across the 2 servers.
> > In particular, when creating the volume, you need to specify the first
> > of each server, and then the second of each server and so on. In your
> > I think it should be something like:
> > gluster volume create volume_name replica 2 transport tcp server1:/exp1
> > server2:/exp1 server1:/exp2 server2:/exp2
> > (replacing the transport type accrding to your network characteristic, if
> > necessary), so that the exp1 on server1 will be replicated on exp1 on
> > 2, and exp2 on server1 will be replicated on exp2 on server2, and all 4
> > bricks together will form a replicated-distributed volume.
> > As I said, you might have followed these steps correctly already, but
> > to double-check.
> > About the mounting, the manuals claim better performances with the native
> > gluster protocol, but I'm not sure this is the case if you have a a huge
> > amount of small files.
> > I experienced big performance problems with a replicated volume that had
> > many small files, and I had to give up entirely on the glusterfs
> > for that particular project. To be fair, because of network topology
> > constraints, my two nodes where using a standar 1Gbit network link,
> > with other network traffic, so the performance issues might be partially
> > caused by the "slow" link, but googling around, I'm not the only one
> > this kind of problem.
> > About your missing files, I have one last (possibly silly)
> > question/suggestion: on the server themselves, did you remount the
> > volume using either the native or nfs protocol on another mount point?
> > I have just a replicated volume, but I found that if you don't do that,
> > above all, if you don't access/create the files on the glusterfs-mounted
> > filesystem but you use the original fs mount point (in my case an xfs),
> > files are not replicated at all.
> > To be clear:
> > You have server1:/brick1 replicated to server2:/brick2. (let's forget
> > distribution, for now).
> > server1:/brick1 is a xfs or ext4 filesystem mounted on a mount point on
> > server.
> > When you create the volume, you must mount the volume via nfs or
> > protocol on another mount point on the server, for example
> > server1:/glustermountpoint
> > When you create files, you must do it on server1:/glustermountpoint, and
> > on server1:/brick1, otherwise the files are not replicated to server2 and
> > they are stored on server1 only.
> > I don't think that the documentation is very clear on this (i don't think
> > that the glusterfs documentation is particularly clear in general) so
> > double-check that as well.
> > Hope this helps...
> > Regards,
> > Davide
> > On 30 May 2013 07:24, Stefano Sinigardi <stefano.sinigardi at gmail.com>
> >> Dear all,
> >> this is my first message to this mailing list and I also just
> >> subscribed to it. So please, forgive me for my inexperience. I hope
> >> this is also the correct place to ask this question. I'm not a system
> >> administrator, even if I'm requested to do so (phd stud here). I like
> >> to do it, but sometimes I'm lacking the required knowledge. Anyway,
> >> here's my problem that, has always, needs to be solved by me as soon
> >> as possible.
> >> I installed gluster 3.3.1 on Ubuntu 12.10 (from the repository) on 4
> >> machines, all connected together via LAN but two also have a special
> >> Infiniband link between them. On two of them I created a "scratch"
> >> volume (distributed, 8 TB tot), on the other two I created a "storage"
> >> volume (distributed + replicated, 12 TB tot but because of replica
> >> just 6 TB available to users). All of the machines see both volumes,
> >> and for now to use them you have to ssh to one of those (in future it
> >> will be exported: do you suggest nfs or gluster as the mounting type?)
> >> The distributed and _not_ replicated filesystem seems to work (at
> >> least for now) very well and also is perfectly accessible from all
> >> machines, even if is built on them connected by infiniband.
> >> The other replicated _and_ distributed filesystem, on the other hand,
> >> has some problems. In fact, from all nodes, it's missing some files
> >> when asked to list file in a folder with commands like 'ls'. This
> >> happened from one day to the other, because I'm sure that three days
> >> ago it was working perfectly. The configuration didn't change (one
> >> machine got rebooted, but even a global reboot didn't fix anything).
> >> I tried to do a volume rebalance to see if it was going to do anything
> >> (it magically fixed a problem at the very beginning of my gluster
> >> adventure), but it never completed: it grew up to a rebalance of
> >> hundred of million of files, but there should not be so many files in
> >> this volume, we're speaking of order of magnitude less. I tried to
> >> list single bricks and I found that files are still present on them,
> >> and each one on two bricks (because of replica), and perfectly working
> >> if directly accessed to read them, so it seems that it's not a
> >> hardware problem on a particular brick.
> >> As another strategy, I found on the internet that a "find . >
> >> /dev/null" launched as root on the root folder of the glusterfs should
> >> trigger a re-hash of the files, so maybe that could help me.
> >> Unfortunately it hangs almost immediately in a folder that, as said,
> >> is missing some files when listed from the global filesystem.
> >> I tried to read logs, but nothing strange seems to be happening (btw:
> >> analysing logs I found out that also the rebalance got stuck in one of
> >> these folders and just started counting millions and millions of
> >> "nonexistant" files (not even in the single brick, I'm sure that those
> >> folder are not so big), so that's why it wrote hundreds of millions of
> >> files non requiring rebalance in the status)
> >> Do you have any suggestion?
> >> Sorry for the long mail, I hope it's enough to explain my problem.
> >> Thanks a lot for your time and for your help, in advance
> >> Best regards to all,
> >> Stefano
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Gluster-users mailing list
> >> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> >> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gluster-users