[Gluster-users] Disappointing documentation?

John Mark Walker johnmark at redhat.com
Thu Mar 7 01:19:28 UTC 2013

----- Original Message -----
> No, that pdf's done in docbook and there's no clean conversion to
> mediawiki. Someone was copy-pasting (often with errors) from the pdf
> into the wiki.
> Somewhere along the way, the decision was made to only have an
> un-editable pdf as the only form of documentation provided by Gluster
> during the transition from their own company to being owned by Red
> Hat.
> I've fought and complained ever since. That's why I'm trying to start
> converting it to asciidoc and having it hosted outside the source
> tree.
> Not only, then, can there be a pdf, but other formats are easily
> accessible from there as well and we can all participate.

Agreed. It's something we have to fix. This will be on the agenda for Friday, when we discuss documentation:



More information about the Gluster-users mailing list