[Gluster-users] One node goes offline, the other node can't see the replicated volume anymore

[Joe Julian]

This is unhelpful and trolling. Please refrain from this behavior.

Brian Candler <b.candler at pobox.com> wrote:

>On 10/07/2013 06:26, Greg Scott wrote:
>>
>> Bummer. Looks like I'm on my own with this one.
>>
>I'm afraid this is the problem with gluster: everything works great on 
>the happy path, but as soon as anything goes wrong, you're stuffed. 
>There is neither recovery procedure documentation, nor detailled 
>internals documentation (so you could work out for yourself what is 
>going on and fix it). In my opinion, gluster is unsupportable in its 
>current form.
>
>For this reason I have recently stripped gluster out of a production 
>network. We're back to using simple NFSv4 at the moment. At some point
>I 
>will be evaluating ceph and maybe swift.
>
>As you've observed, there's little point in having "resilient" copies
>of 
>data if they are not retrievable in error scenarios.
>
>Regards,
>
>Brian.
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gluster-users mailing list
>Gluster-users at gluster.org
>http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20130711/81acc8f8/attachment.html>