[Gluster-users] Gluster caching behaviour

Nguyen Viet Cuong mrcuongnv at gmail.com
Thu Dec 5 06:25:17 UTC 2013

Hi Diep,

You can check it out in the slide from Red Hat or conduct the benchmark by
yourself which simulates the high-load environment. I saw the positive
effects of changing the swappiness and the scheduler for block devices, for
example. I will share the benchmark results when I have new storage for

FYI, the enterprise-storage profile for "tuned" will change most of the
options mentioned by Lanning as well as other options such as elevator.


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Diep Pham Van <imeo at favadi.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:32:32 +0900
> Nguyen Viet Cuong <mrcuongnv at gmail.com> wrote:
> > If you use RHEL 6 or the like, you should consider to install tuned &
> > tuned-utils and activate the enterprise-storage profile as the baseline
> > before going to more advanced tuning.
> Can you provide some benchmark result before and after active
> enterprise-storage profile?
> --
> Diep Pham Van <imeo at favadi.com>

Nguyen Viet Cuong
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20131205/255b93e2/attachment.html>

More information about the Gluster-users mailing list