[Gluster-users] GlusterFS was removed from Fedora EPEL

Paul Simpson paul at realisestudio.com
Wed Dec 4 13:22:22 UTC 2013

Hi Nguyen,

We also have fixed using 3.2.7 for production - it works well for us.

I was thinking to upgrade to 3.4.x in the next month or so. I'd like to
understand more - how many people are actually using 3.4.1? Can anyone
(users) or from gluster/redhat chime in here - would be reassuring to hear
that the latest version is also the greatest..



On 2 December 2013 15:52, Nguyen Viet Cuong <mrcuongnv at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> Actually, I have very bad experience with GlusterFS 3.3.x and 3.4.x under
> very high pressure (> 64 processes write in parallel in more than 10
> minutes, for example). GlusterFS 3.2.7 from EPEL is really stable and we
> use it for production.
> Unfortunately, there is no official built of GlusterFS 3.2.x on Gluster's
> repo.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20131204/5ff7ee10/attachment.html>

More information about the Gluster-users mailing list