[Gluster-users] cluster.min-free-disk not working
Varun Shastry
vshastry at redhat.com
Tue Apr 16 05:02:59 UTC 2013
Hi Thomos,
It was a bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874554 and its
fixed now.
-Varun Shastry
On Tuesday 16 April 2013 12:18 AM, Thomas Wakefield wrote:
> Was there ever a solution for setting min-free-disk? I have a cluster of about 30 bricks, some are 8TB and new bricks are 50TB. I should be able to set gluster to leave 500GB free on each brick. But one of the 8TB bricks keeps filling up with new data.
>
> This is my current setting:
> cluster.min-free-disk: 500GB
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Running 3.3.1.
>
> -Tom
>
>
> On Aug 26, 2012, at 2:15 AM, James Kahn <jkahn at idea11.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Further to my last email, I've been trying to find out why GlusterFS is
>> favouring one brick over another. In pretty much all of my tests gluster
>> is favouring the MOST full brick to write to. This is not a good thing
>> when the most full brick has less than 200GB free and I need to write a
>> huge file to it.
>>
>> I've set cluster.min-free-disk on the volume, and it doesn't seem to have
>> an effect. At all. I've tried setting it to 25%, and 400GB. When I run
>> tests from an NFS client, they get written to the most full brick. There
>> is less than 10% free on that brick so it should be ignore with the
>> defaults anyway.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> JK
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list